It's not that Fola is a bad character....

Jul 31, 2005 18:49

Dear Musashi,


Read more... )

Leave a comment

auroleus August 1 2005, 05:18:20 UTC
Whoa. That's cool, actually. Fola's supposed to be one of the rarer characters people end up as. And hey, it could be worse. You could be Lem.

We talking scrying here? And on that note, do you ever use the set of geometry stones anymore?

Reply

kwishin August 2 2005, 01:54:16 UTC
Really? Well. If Fola's rare, kwishin feels much more special. That makes it better. :P
And that's true. I'd rather be Fola then Lem. Actually, I've started to warm up to Fola a lot now.

And yes, we were talking about scrying. Saw a tower/rook split in half by scrying.
Yes. I do use the set of geometry stones. Rarely though, only when I'm doing Really Important Stuff. Like rituals. Which is not to often.
Hmm. Maybe I should use the stones while scrying... more thoughts on this later. This deserves pondering.

Reply

auroleus August 2 2005, 05:12:48 UTC
Any possibility of using tarot symbolism on the tower, or were you trying to avoid that?

Reply

kwishin August 2 2005, 07:06:58 UTC
No no, I did think of that. The was my first thought in fact. And all things considering, tarot symbolism is probably what it was, it makes perfect sense given the situation.
I think it's just the fact that I'm stuck on the whole, it really really looked like a rook. But I'll have to take into consideration that what I can scry is only so detailed. Like magic eye imagery detailed. So yeah. Probably tarot. Even if it did look like a chess piece split in two.

Reply

auroleus August 2 2005, 07:33:37 UTC
Maa. If you're really stuck on what it looked like, odds are that's important, no? Besides. If it looked like a rook and the rook represents the Tower in terms of tarot symbolism, maybe you ought to consider it from the perspective of a Game?

Reply

kwishin August 3 2005, 02:54:03 UTC
Irk. That makes things even more confusing. Thank you soooo much.
:P
But yeah, thanks for pointing that out.

Reply

auroleus August 3 2005, 21:42:34 UTC
*Dryly.* This one lives to serve.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up