So... "The Man Who Fell To Earth".

Jun 19, 2010 23:02

I went down to the Harvard Film Archive this evening, to try to meet up with a group I'd heard of online. I didn't actually see any of them -- traffic, plus finding my way there for the first time, made me get there a bit later than I'd expected -- but I caught the film anyways. It was... surreal ( Read more... )

movies, meetup, 1970's

Leave a comment

dylanesque29 June 20 2010, 04:38:11 UTC
Don't even talk to me about weird 70's films until you've seen The Holy Mountain or El Topo. They make The Man Who Fell To Earth look pretty straight.

Reply

kurukami June 20 2010, 10:13:11 UTC
*raises eyebrow* Heh. You say that as though it's a worthwhile gradation, like seeing them will make this LESS weird in my head as opposed to them just being... weirder. ; )

Reply

dylanesque29 June 20 2010, 16:53:00 UTC
Point. I suspect reading the novel would lend a lot of clarity.

Reply

kurukami June 20 2010, 20:57:31 UTC
No doubt. But I have to argue that a movie should be good in its own right, rather than requiring the novel to complete it. Hell, just look at the mess what's-his-name made out of Starship Troopers. *grin*

The Shawshank Redemption is a great example.

Reply

dylanesque29 June 20 2010, 23:28:31 UTC
I'm not sure I would say Starship Troopers was a mess.....just very, very different than what Heinlein intended....

Reply

kurukami June 21 2010, 00:25:35 UTC
Any adaptation which doesn't involve powered armor is a failure. *grin* C'mon, it's a MAIN THEME of the novel. Not putting it in is like doing a movie version of The Shawshank Redemption without it being in prison. ; )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up