deleted

May 02, 2007 11:10

i got a message the other day, from this little 'dark art' girl
http://www.myspace.com/devious_doll701

The rabbit picture is over the top isn't it? That's disgusting art. I mean, I like dark things, but that served no purpose.
It's makes you seem like less of a woman to me, because the picture conveys that you are cruel or sick.... and without compassion. You probably don't care , but I didn't expect you to. You make the money and that's all that matters right?

s

so myspace finally decided to delete my bunny foofoo image.

this one


i wonder if i should put it up again...
or maybe just have it on my profile page rather than in the gallery section...

anyhoo, it's so lame. an image that actually takes a bit of thought to interpret. i don't care if you don't like it or anything. it's still got some sort of meaning behind it that, although not immediately obvious, can put the viewer into an uncertain position. (is the image for or against fur, etc). it is meant to be intangible while the obvious props and presentation (shaved head, skinned embraced rabbit, fur gloves, etc) are supposed to lead to an inconclusive state.

instead of putting on make up, having my head photo-shopped nice and smooth, and perfecting any imperfections, and throwing on some sexy outfit, we decided to do this image.
and i'm getting the impression that this type of stuff isn't even worth doing. instead, people should only be creating art that is appealing to all that appreciates only the most mundane and generally accepted forms of art (read: beauty)

bah.
just another step towards being unmotivated.
thanks, idiots.

bald, picposts5, leather, maximeavet, rants, lille

Previous post Next post
Up