Mar 29, 2005 12:35
In a relationship filled with so many wonderful things, all I seem to dwell on is the lack of .... poetry. Can a hopeless romantic (who beyond a doubt believes in the existence of soulmates) ever truly be happy with someone who doubts the existence of true love, and scorns poetry. I'm beginning to feel a little bit like Carrie (a la Sex and the City); but where she is capable of cleverly twisting her romantic hardships into amusing anecdotes, I only seem capable of muddying up my current state of affairs even further. It seems that I'm at a draw ... I can either have a relationship brimming with romance and passion, with little room for intellectual stimulation and growth, or a relationship with little romance, and all of the other stimulation I could possibly ask for. Which is the most essential? Or more importantly, if I was in a truly healthy relationship, would I even be asking myself this question? Shouldn't my "soul mate" be reciprocating my level of romance/passion/desire with at least an equal amount of intensity?
It seems to me that this situation is being aggravated further by the fact that I have felt the intensity of emotion and adoration that I so desire (from an altogether different source), and it is intoxicating. I want to be loved so much that sometimes it physically makes my partner ache, I want to see how much they love me (and find me attractive) in their eyes, I want to be kissed like I am the very air they need to survive, and most of all, I want them to be able to share their feelings with me verbally. This seems like a great deal to ask and/or expect, and sometimes I wonder if what I'm looking for actually exists, but then I remember that I am worth too much to ever consider settling. So call me a hopeless romantic ... or worse ... but I call it "knowing what I want."
A world without poetry has no need of science ... for what could possibly be worth discovery or salvation that lacks the soul to love with purity and selflessness.