We must decide not to be too busy or stupid to understand some macroeconomics

Nov 21, 2014 04:18

Emailed this to Dave and Mark the day after the election:

As for yesterday's election, it went even worse than I'd feared (though so far it looks as if the Dems held onto the governor's office in Colorado, though just barely). My only thought, which is not necessarily correct as far as winning elections goes, but ( Read more... )

alienation, mutual incomprehension pact, paul krugman, economics

Leave a comment

Re: MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) ext_2941925 December 30 2014, 23:18:50 UTC
I probably shouldn't be too dismissive of Krugman, since I've only read scattered articles of his; but I've been more impressed with some others. MMT can reasonably described as another Keynesianism, but it seems quite radical in certain respects, and it's arguments have a lot of force.

Since posting last night, I find this terrific talk Kelton gave at an Italian seminar on MMT. (I think she is speaking in such a way as to make it easier for the live translator barely audible in the background.) In particular, this section on sectoral balances is thrilling. It ends with an anlysis of the impossibility or near-impossibility of EU states that don't issue their own currency, to meet the neo-liberal demands they've agreed to, without destroying their private sectors. She jokes about the graphs (economists have to use graphs!) but they actually are quite effective:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yd6rGbO-ruU&feature=youtu.be&t=46m45s

FWIW, I'd probably recommend this over the videos I linked to above, because it is more focused.

(Not sure if html tags work here or I would linkify.)

Reply

Re: MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) koganbot December 30 2014, 23:37:07 UTC
Linkage works:

Summit MMT

Reply


Leave a comment

Up