Posted this on a
Freaky Trigger comment thread:
The elephants in the room of popular music, the ones who not only don't get talked about by critics and who (as far as I know) don’t get paid attention to on news or entertainment sites either, but who also get undercounted on Billboard and are mostly excluded from the Brit singles chart and
(
Read more... )
I've long assumed that crunk takes its basic tonal sense from the romanticism of nineteenth and twentieth century "serious" music (rather than say from rhythm & blues, though of course there's no law stopping it from taking from both), but that this was owing to wanting to create the feel of suspense and horror movies - the composers of which were steeped in European romanticism. (Which isn't to say that I've done any research into what Jon, Banner, and Collipark were drawing from or getting at.)
Since critics are people, and people generally are exposed to TV sets and radios and the like, I think the critic is familiar with a huge variety of music, whether or not that variety gets into his or her library.
Another thought: "soundtrack" probably doesn't connote in people's mind quite what is going on - or even remotely what is going on - in TV commercials, almost all of which use music but the music very rarely coalesces into anything like a song or even a jingle. It's almost like: a rhythm, jumpy or not-so-jumpy depending; a daub of rock, or a daub of disco, or a daub of mood; perhaps followed by a wash of something. Back when I lived in San Francisco one of my roommates, a very good jazz musician, was once invited to play on a TV commercial. He said if you'd filmed the session it'd have made This Is Spinal Tap seem like Schindler's List in comparison.
Reply
Leave a comment