Yesterday, I was giving someone some
Supernatural fic recs and I went to make sure I'd recommended the correct author. While I was there, I noticed that the person had written a lot of posts about
Bones in her journal. I was really delighted until I realised that she was only watching the show because of David Boreanaz and absolutely hated the
(
Read more... )
I don't see it necessarily as implying a value judgment that a woman has to be better than a man to be as good as a man. I think I just find it cool to watch :D
Reply
But why then we have so many kick-ass heroines? What I think - many people they only like heroine if she is able to be able to do this. How many heroines are out there who are not exceptionally good at marital arts but who are an exceptional person whom the young girls will want to follow, to make their idol? How did this happen? What happened to being a good mother?? To the inner-qualities? The media of today is trying to masculinise female characters, IMHO. If it was more balanced I could have liked it, may be. But not all the time.
For example - from the top of my head I can't remember any heroine in the recent Western media who is not "better then a man in a man's field" and who creates a cult to follow. Women are either objects of possession for men, or they HAVE to be better to be noticed.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I agree about Medium (and this is why I like this otherwise missable show). But I have to "agree to disagree" about Sara. She started quite good, but in the season 2 for me she turned into the "doormat" variety. This is why I stopped watching the show.
And I have to disagree about the fact that the creators only try to make their characters different. In the case of kick-ass heroines I believe there is a chunk of ill-understood feminism there as well. And I object about MY feminist issue to be represented like that. If someone always carries their equality as a BIG BANNER around, it totally defeats the object IMHO.
I don't actually object to kick-ass heroines (they are one of my guilty pleasures), but to what they represent (that ill-understood feminism). It is like with coca-cola or Starbucks - I don't like that they represent a Monopolistic conglomerate, but I do have them sometimes as a guilty pleasure.( I happen to like coca-cola :D)
Reply
Leave a comment