A small look inside my head this morning:
It's not quite noon and I'm doing ok for someone who slept until nearly 9am. I've had breakfast AND lunch (food is important, after all), I'm dressed (what, yoga pants and a Dr Who tee doesn't count as dressed?) and I have this week's recipe in the crock pot (I'm trying to cook once a week. This time it's
(
Read more... )
You needed 36 credits to graduate = 9 credits/yr, 3 per term.
The course hours would be like this:
MWF = 3 x 70 min classes x 10 weeks
T-Th = 2 x 2hr classes x 10 weeks
You could do three lab classes (never recommended, although I often had two), each with a 3-4 hr lab each week, which would be 3 credits. Or you could do 3 non-lab classes, which would be 3 credits.
The music classes were sometimes partial credits: 1/3 credit band + 1/6 credit music lessons = 3.5 credits in a term, the max most advisors were comfortable with.
So if I did the math right, you could have 3 MWF, no labs, which would be 10.5 hrs/week for 3 credits.
Or you might do 2 T-TH, 1 MWF, two 4-hr labs, which would be 19.5 hrs/week for 3 credits.
Oohhhh. So that's why they ditched 1 course = 1 credit after I left. But a class with lab is still the same number of units as a humanities class, so it's still sort of imbalanced for science students? Maybe?
Taking 4 credits in a term was strongly discouraged and considered overloading and always required advisor signature. Anyone who did that was generally going to be a stress puppy. Against advice, I overloaded my very last trimester. Even though one of the credits was independent study (or perhaps because), I nearly failed one of the classes (Literatur der Wende).
Reply
Stanford was like Northwestern, which is why I was assume that's what anyplace on quarters "has" to use this system. Oddly enough, after being a student on quarters I only taught on semesters!
Reply
Leave a comment