Leave a comment

NOT THAT ARMAND SHOULD TALK. eternally17 November 5 2011, 22:59:17 UTC
It depends on the person and their reaction to knowing what they've done.

I would also be concerned with who has been killed and why.

Reply

HEY MAN, EVERYONE'S GOTTA WEIGH IN knew_anyway November 6 2011, 01:23:47 UTC
If it's a matter of self defense, of course it should be somewhat excusable. But should we really punish people on account of who regrets it more?

Reply

APPARENTLY! eternally17 November 8 2011, 05:56:06 UTC
Not on it's own, put at least in part. There is no easy way to judge punishment for such a thing. It is easier when the person is in the obvious moral wrong.

Reply

knew_anyway November 9 2011, 18:28:11 UTC
Which during an event, is almost impossible to discern. That's the one large hangup we've had here as a police force.

Reply

eternally17 November 10 2011, 02:04:45 UTC
[He chuckles a bit, but doesn't say anything to indicate what he found amusing.]

Perhaps for the moral ones, the guilt is enough punishment.

Reply

knew_anyway November 10 2011, 22:37:10 UTC
And the immoral?

[Frowning a little at the chuckling.]

Reply

eternally17 November 14 2011, 08:31:49 UTC
Punish the redeemable, kill the ones who are outright evil. [He speaks evenly without hesitation or self-doubt. This was actually an improvement, considering how he once survived.]

Reply

knew_anyway November 15 2011, 06:40:48 UTC
Death is not permanent here, and should never be administered as a punishment.

Reply

eternally17 November 16 2011, 18:39:28 UTC
How can death not be permanent?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up