Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III
[I originally wrote this piece in 2005 and a friend posted it on his website. That site has recently gone down, so I'm reposting it here, as it still gets a lot of interest.]
If we accept all the Star Wars films as the same canon (as it seems we must) then a lot that happens in the original films has
(
Read more... )
This whole piece is written by extrapolating the depictions in the movies, and nothing else is acceptable. The movies never specify that Chewbacca spent time as a slave. The movies never specify that Solo was a cadet of any kind. The movies never specify that Jedi shun material possessions. The movies never state Obi Wan's mission is NOT to dispose of Luke if things start going bad.
The lack of material posession? It is hinted at, kinda, but unless outright stated by Lucas, it's pure speculation. And in fact, the 20 gazillion "EU" books out there, are pure speculation as well. It's all a bunch of "maybes".
This dissertation is just as valid as anything else, barring George Lucas' commentary.
The ultimate point is that while we can skewer the storytelling today, when Star Wars was released, it heralded a new chapter in movie-making history, drawing in theatrical crowds for an ENTIRE YEAR! Could you imagine James Cameron's Avatar being in theatres for an entire year?
Yes many of the devices are over-used, the dialog now seems dated, but that is because Star Wars spoiled us. We now all know what an Ion Cannon is, we all know what hyperdrive is, because Star Wars dragged all of that stuff out of "Amazing Stories" and threw it in front of a (mostly unprepared) world audience.
Star Wars broke new ground, and amazed an entire world of moviegoers. Making that kind of effect today, I do not believe is possible.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment