Review: ST: The Good Men Do

Jun 23, 2008 21:10

I'm trying to read The Good Men Do. It's halfway a good story, but the narration relies heavily on telling rather than showing, often with several repetitions. The bits with Trip, Archer and Reed are decent - they have me convinced that Trip would be obsessed enough, in the midst of grief and fear, to join Section 31. I'm just not sure who that ( Read more... )

rant, fandom

Leave a comment

Comments 2

rigil_kent July 7 2008, 00:48:51 UTC
Ah, someone else who does not bow down before the utter and complete tripe that is TGTMD. I recall expressing a similar sentiment many moons back but became completely disillusioned with various members of the fanbase as they gushed over it. Point of fact: I completely ceased visiting the most prominent TnT website because of arguments about this garbage. (Admittedly, there were other issues, but that was the straw that broke the proverbial camel's back ( ... )

Reply

Re: TGTMD kkglinka July 30 2008, 03:20:38 UTC
Wow, yeah, me and my sense of passing time. Nonexistent. (Actually, busy with a fix-it-fic).

Ah, someone else who does not bow down before the utter and complete tripe that is TGTMD.It was pretty shite. I went and finished it because I found myself writing a fix-it-fic and it just kept getting worse. I'm not sure what went down with Archer and the Andorians, because I didn't give a bloody damn. All I can recall about that was T'Pol sort of playing lassie. She had one cool moment when she did the classic macho fist-catch when confronted with an Andorian (Shran?) but otherwise spent most her time fawning on Archer, while other characters very pointedly told the reader how totally awesome he was. I had to pry a sledge-hammer out of my forehead a few times. Then there were the ebil ebil Romulans who were completely corrupt, amoral perverts... except for the kindly old man scientist. Which is weird, because I seem to recall that Romulans were almost exactly like Vulcans, but more openly aggressive and somewhat self-indulgent (when not on ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up