As I understand it, there is no reliable knock-out gas. Many of them at suitable concentrations will kill almost as often as knock out.
The problem is in the delivery methods - vapor is not reliably concentrated over time.
And your point about SEALs may not be valid. Folks who have lost consciousness may very well know they did so, and there is every chance they will raise an alarm. Distracting someone with something embarrassing and potentially damaging such as the effects of this gay bomb deal would mean they might have nothing to report.
Contrast: "Sir, we smelled a funny smell like almonds, then we both passed out. When we woke up, something like an hour had passed." Versus: "Sir, we were distracted for the better part of an hour, screwing each other's brains out. Possibly a SEAL team sneaked by during that time? We really have no idea what was going on outside this room."
Sometimes the requirements of a mission might be that no one knows you were ever there. Having something like this in your arsenal could have potential use.
I forget sometimes that homosexuals still have to protect themselves. That is a bunch of arse, and makes me hate you more. Please don't take that personally, because I don't hate you generally rather than personally.
However, taking my post seriously is just silly. At most, I was hoping that someone, somewhere, might look at this a different way. This wasn't an attack on homosexuality, this gay bomb. It was an attempt to think outside the box.
And I have no opinion on the "cause" of homosexuality. I'm just saying that if it is biological, built in, then there is some way for me to screw with your sexuality using chemicals or at the least direct neural stimulus.
The fact that we don't know the "cause" of homosexuality is not the point, and frankly I'd be surprised to learn that it isn't as deeply ingrained as the supposed gene that causes alcoholism - this is a bad example, as I am not trying to compare homosexuality to alcoholism, but this is a good example of something everyone KNEW was just some guy being an idiot and going out to get drunk when he should have made a better choice, whereas modern medicine suggests that it may be something built in.
I'm trying to say that if sexuality is a physical/genetic/biological/chemical thing, I can screw with it using tools. If it is a mental thing, I can screw with it using various forms of conditioning.
And even if it isn't? If I really wanted to, I could lock someone in a room and using various conditioning tools, I could probably make them do whatever I wanted, including changing their sexual orientation. I can't say for sure that they wouldn't become serial killers or something after that, but that's not my concern, is it?
The problem is in the delivery methods - vapor is not reliably concentrated over time.
And your point about SEALs may not be valid. Folks who have lost consciousness may very well know they did so, and there is every chance they will raise an alarm. Distracting someone with something embarrassing and potentially damaging such as the effects of this gay bomb deal would mean they might have nothing to report.
Contrast: "Sir, we smelled a funny smell like almonds, then we both passed out. When we woke up, something like an hour had passed."
Versus: "Sir, we were distracted for the better part of an hour, screwing each other's brains out. Possibly a SEAL team sneaked by during that time? We really have no idea what was going on outside this room."
Sometimes the requirements of a mission might be that no one knows you were ever there. Having something like this in your arsenal could have potential use.
I forget sometimes that homosexuals still have to protect themselves. That is a bunch of arse, and makes me hate you more. Please don't take that personally, because I don't hate you generally rather than personally.
However, taking my post seriously is just silly. At most, I was hoping that someone, somewhere, might look at this a different way. This wasn't an attack on homosexuality, this gay bomb. It was an attempt to think outside the box.
And I have no opinion on the "cause" of homosexuality. I'm just saying that if it is biological, built in, then there is some way for me to screw with your sexuality using chemicals or at the least direct neural stimulus.
The fact that we don't know the "cause" of homosexuality is not the point, and frankly I'd be surprised to learn that it isn't as deeply ingrained as the supposed gene that causes alcoholism - this is a bad example, as I am not trying to compare homosexuality to alcoholism, but this is a good example of something everyone KNEW was just some guy being an idiot and going out to get drunk when he should have made a better choice, whereas modern medicine suggests that it may be something built in.
I'm trying to say that if sexuality is a physical/genetic/biological/chemical thing, I can screw with it using tools. If it is a mental thing, I can screw with it using various forms of conditioning.
And even if it isn't? If I really wanted to, I could lock someone in a room and using various conditioning tools, I could probably make them do whatever I wanted, including changing their sexual orientation. I can't say for sure that they wouldn't become serial killers or something after that, but that's not my concern, is it?
Reply
Leave a comment