Mar 25, 2010 10:41
If you wish me to not quote Star Trek in this essay, could you please provide me with references that don't quote Star Trek themselves?
This is the third time I've hit a webpage with the friggin' Horta, I am not putting "Dammit, lecturer, I'm a silicon-based life form, not an Earth-like organism" in my work.
NO.
BAD INTERNET.
internets,
irl
Leave a comment
Reply
Reply
Carbon dioxide is lovely for trees. Silica dioxide is motherfucking sand. TREES NO LIKE SAND.
Reply
And some trees actually do quite well in sand. As do grasses *dons horticulture hat*
Reply
Oh, indeed, sorry. Ha ha. Writing the essay now and it's specific to "Earth-like life" so I'm stuck in that midset. After this essay, I'll believe in super intelligent shades of the colour blue again.
AND TREES DON'T BREATHE SAND.
Reply
You're not talking breathing sand sand - there's a gaseous exchange occurring from the spaces in between. Think of a seedling pushing up through the soil. From one viewpoint, until it breaks surface hey! It's breathing dirt! It's actually not though.
And again, this only applies to Earth. You could have trees on other planets with markedly different atmospheres - they'd be basically unrecognisable (fuck, photosynthesis could be none-existent) but they'd be a tree-like construct. It's really only what's on this planet that has the dependency on oxygen mandating growth and size. In another environment without that gas (even our own before the atmosphere started filling with a poisonous, corrosive gas) life can still boing on.
Reply
Leave a comment