Ruskin, the Great & AP English

Jan 22, 2007 23:53

Ruskin’s argument has shown every possible bit of validity. His motives for his accusations, or at least, his insinuations of the Philosopher as being a romanticistic imbecile, falls right in place. Philosophically, stated by Peter Betancourt himself, “The Soldier will always cover their own duty, while possibly, doing the others’ duties as well.”

The Merchant, generally speaking, will only follow their need to capitalize. The Soldier can in turn, haggle with prices and kill a few people (or be killed), in the name of the State. It takes a lot to kill a man. The Bazaar is no place for honor; the Battlefield is no place for degenerates.

The Manufacturer, just as the Merchant, will continue their life profession. Their niche, resembling a slight similarity to that of the Merchant, for the exception of the following: Who manufactures the weapons that propel the State’s military onward? Not the soldiers, that’s for sure. If worst comes to worst, and the Philosopher penetrate the Manufacturer mind, the Soldier will make his own gunpowder.

The Soldier, however, will do all of these in the name of the State, eloquently humble, of course. As romanticistic and holy the Philosopher may seem, a soldier will always remain a necessity until the Day draws closer.

Although, the hypocritical scumbag on the street corner will say otherwise, I stand by John Ruskin in this one.

I HATE YOU, ROSEN.

PS. negsss will be posted soon; more neggssss to follow.

john ruskin

Previous post Next post
Up