As I mentioned yesterday, I am going to focus this blog more on relating moral theory to action. The first action that I would recommend is to oppose acts that lead to the possibility of a Palin presidency. A person with good desires and true and complete beliefs would be adamantly opposed to any action that would put Palin a heartbeat away from
(
Read more... )
Oddly, McCain and Palin's op-ed in the WSJ (9/9/08) blames Congress for not having stepped in years ago: "what we are now seeing is an exercise in crisis management rather than sound planning, and at great cost to taxpayers." McCain has served in Congress for twenty-six years. Whose failure is the lack of sound planning?
--------------------
Re: the rest. The author is not writing as a politician or a pundit, but as an ethicist/philosopher. Fyfe calls his philosophy "desire utilitarianism" (outlined here: http://www.alonzofyfe.com/article_du.shtml). The purpose of this particular article is not to reiterate the anti-Palin talking points of the day or to make a long list of reasons why she's a terrible person; it's a logical argument (in the desire utilitarianism framework) against voting for a ticket that includes her. Agreed that the _examples_ he chooses are not of earth-shattering importance, but they nonetheless strongly support the notion that Palin is unqualified to hold high national office because, in holding to those beliefs, _she fails to acknowledge her own limitations_. This is a trait that both Fyfe and I believe is inimical to prudent exercise of power.
Reply
Leave a comment