no, he didn't
dont get me wrong, i feel sorry for the family, especially his kids, who now have to grow up without a father.
but he didn't draw his gun because he was trying to protect his "other" relatives from retribution and other sensationalised crap the media wants you to believe. And it could not have been an "easy" shot for mr. councilor.
He didn't draw his gun because he couldn't. It's simply not humanly possible. Unless he had four arms and had superspeed, there was no way he could have pulled his gun out while holding a friggin DLSR camera with two hands. And that's assuming he noticed the killer through the camera's lens just before he clicked the shutter. If he tried that shit, only two two things couldve happened: the killer would have pulled the trigger at him or his family. or he might have fled. i think the former most likely would have happened because he already had proper aim on councilor.
If the councilor did notice him earlier, which, as his family says, might be why he took so long to take the shot, it's most likely because he didn't know what to do/ couldn't do anything. Put yourself in his position. You've got someone behind your family, pointing a gun at ya. If you draw, killer has already aimed at you and would probably pull the trigger in panic. If you don't draw, do you alert your family of the danger? How can you tell them discretely?--while holding a friggin DLSR camera? What happens if the killer notices and panics? If you don't draw, you face certain death, but increase your family's survival rate. What do you do? You've got seconds to decide.
In my mind he was already resigned to taking the bullet. Now that's love.
it's just a matter of deductive reasoning? isnt it?
but he didn't draw his gun because he was trying to protect his "other" relatives from retribution and other sensationalised crap the media wants you to believe. And it could not have been an "easy" shot for mr. councilor.
He didn't draw his gun because he couldn't. It's simply not humanly possible. Unless he had four arms and had superspeed, there was no way he could have pulled his gun out while holding a friggin DLSR camera with two hands. And that's assuming he noticed the killer through the camera's lens just before he clicked the shutter. If he tried that shit, only two two things couldve happened: the killer would have pulled the trigger at him or his family. or he might have fled. i think the former most likely would have happened because he already had proper aim on councilor.
If the councilor did notice him earlier, which, as his family says, might be why he took so long to take the shot, it's most likely because he didn't know what to do/ couldn't do anything. Put yourself in his position. You've got someone behind your family, pointing a gun at ya. If you draw, killer has already aimed at you and would probably pull the trigger in panic. If you don't draw, do you alert your family of the danger? How can you tell them discretely?--while holding a friggin DLSR camera? What happens if the killer notices and panics? If you don't draw, you face certain death, but increase your family's survival rate. What do you do? You've got seconds to decide.
In my mind he was already resigned to taking the bullet. Now that's love.
it's just a matter of deductive reasoning? isnt it?