The Newsroom 1.7: 5/1

Aug 06, 2012 14:58

An anonymous source contacts Charlie and provides advance details on an imminent story of national importance. When news breaks that the President will be making a televised speech that night, the 2.0 staff cuts short its one-year (and one-week) anniversary party, and rushes back to the newsroom amidst a flurry of speculation as to what exactly ( Read more... )

the newsroom

Leave a comment

marymary August 9 2012, 19:21:57 UTC
Totally agree with you -- Don is not Roy. Though The Office did add dimension to Roy over time, Don is not Roy. I really enjoy Don. And I love TS' POV on him, from that interview you posted. :)

Ha, that is interesting Sorkin trivia. Though I sort of disagree with him -- I think there are lots of people who aren't in the business who sing really well. Most great singers don't make a living as singers, IMO.

The will they/won't they with Josh and Donna would've been less fun if it were in every episode.

Yes, AND it was a completely different thing. It was an undercurrent -- it was a look here and a tone of voice there. It was some offhand question Josh would ask someone else about Donna and then the story would move on. It was banter -- not ABOUT them -- about other things. It was about the work, and we'd infer their intentions and feelings. I miss that.

Can you imagine, in the first season, any character saying to Josh, "I think you like Donna." And then saying it the next week? And the week after that? And then Donna saying to her best friend, "I do not like Josh! Josh, please tell her I don't have feelings for you."

You may argue that these are different characters -- and if you do, I'd say that's a fair point. I guess then I have to conclude I just don't like spending time with them as much. :)

Reply

tomfoolery815 August 10 2012, 01:27:14 UTC
No, I agree. This is text as opposed to subtext. I think I would rather have it be subtext for a while.

Reply

marymary August 10 2012, 02:07:05 UTC
Yeah, just to be clear, I knew you agreed. When I said "You may argue" I meant "One may argue." :)

Team Subtext!

Reply

tomfoolery815 August 10 2012, 02:26:35 UTC
*high-five smack of palms*

Reply

anatolealice August 11 2012, 12:53:02 UTC
Love Team Subtext, lol.

To me it's entirely different to Josh and Donna. Not even in the same universe. That was beautifully, subtlly done and this, well, it's like fic. But I am shallow enough to be totally ok with that :-) . I reallyI enjoy them.

Reply

elinorigbe August 10 2012, 03:13:41 UTC
Great points, Mary. The subtle intrigue between J & D was what made it so exciting. I likened it to a 1930's movie, sex without touching, sophisticated innuendos, very classy and extremely sexy.

This interplay leaves nothing to the imagination, and that's why we tire of it.

Reply

marymary August 10 2012, 03:23:22 UTC
Yes, I think the "30s feel" is spot on, elinor. Fun but sophisticated.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up