Thought For The Day
The rise of governments filled with climate-change deniers has led people to complain that governments (and politicians) "shouldn't have ideology-led policies". Which, while I can see where they're coming from, has always niggled at me as not-quite-right. Because every single political party under the sun has an ideology, that's what makes them a political party, not just a bunch of random power-hungry douchebags. (Though many of them are still random power-hungry douchebags.)
One may disagree with a particular ideology, but that doesn't mean that they shouldn't have one -- because, as I said, everyone has one, so it isn't the fact of having an ideology that leads to nutty decision-making or everyone would be doing it.
So where does the problem lie? Ideology influences policy: that is good, that is its purpose. Ideology, however has no business influencing your science, your engineering, or your maths. That is like putting your cart before your horse and then shooting your horse for being defective because it couldn't push the cart. Science, maths and engineering will no more bow to your ideology than the mountains will bow to a butterfly. To believe otherwise is magical thinking, like a cargo-cult.
Ideology-led mistakes can happen to both the Left-wing and the Right-wing. Yes, the left-wing can ignore science too; or be ignorant of the unintended consequences of their actions. I mean, it's all very well to say "conservation is good", but does that mean one shouldn't do preventative burn-offs? Does it mean one shouldn't uproot the stumps of trees that have fallen? (I can't remember the specifics of that one, I just remember vaguely some farmer complaining about Greenies making it illegal for him to uproot tree stumps that needed uprooting, but I can't remember what the reason for uprooting them was, just that it was apparently a good reason, and that the Greenies policy was a knee-jerk reaction that was impractical and insufficiently pragmatic. I have insufficient data to say whether the farmer was biased, or whether the Greenies were ignorant.)
(This thought is brought to you by the Banqiao Dam Disaster which can partially be laid at the feet of the ideology-led policies of Mao Zedong...)
So, what do you think? Any examples of left-wing stupid decisions that are better than the ones I could not properly remember? Any thoughts on the rise in magical thinking and the denial of science? Thoughts as to why that has been happening? Please chip in with your comments!
This entry was originally posted at https://kerravonsen.dreamwidth.org/1197844.html. (Comments
) Respond here, or respond on the Dreamwidth post, as you prefer. You can use your DW login or OpenId there.