This for the anti-Twilight fans. No, really. It is.
dumblydore, I am looking specifically at you.
I yanked this from cleolinda, because I love her JUST THAT MUCH...and because this is too damn good not to fuck up your friend's pages with.
From an interview with Empire magazine:
"When you read the book," says Pattinson, looking appropriately pallid and interesting even without makeup, "it's like, 'Edward Cullen was so beautiful I creamed myself.' I mean, every line is like that. He's the most ridiculous person who's so amazing at everything. I think a lot of actors tried to play that aspect. I just couldn't do that. And the more I read the script, the more I hated this guy, so that's how I played him, as a manic-depressive who hates himself. Plus, he's a 108-year-old virgin so he's obviously got some issues there."
RPattz, I LOVE YOU. I love you for being REALISTIC about Edward Cullen, for accepting that he is Stephanie Meyers sekrit lover, for understanding that the author WROTE A GARY STU IN ALL BUT NAME.
I mean, at least when you got to play Cedric, you brought depth and humanity to the character. (Rowling, I love you, and I love the humility book!Cedric displayed, but Pattison brought him TO LIFE.)
Also? The manic-depressive self-hatred that Pattison is bringing to the role will become the SOLE reason I see this film. Also the 108 virgin who clearly needs unburdening of that particular problem, but don't look at me to do it!
(The Twilight fans will be more than happy to whore themselves out for the chance to "fuck a popsicle".)
Seriously, Meyers, you took the vampiric world and FUCKED IT IN THE ASS. I'm not even sure how you managed that (dildo of epic proportions, maybe?), but SIRIUSLY!
For the love of Bram Stoker and Gary Oldman (I love you, Oldman), vampires are not HARD. Well, not like that anyway, and they aren't ICE COLD either. What planet are you residing in? Did you DO your research? Wait, that's a rhetorical question.
And sparkly? SPARKLY? Are they all going through the glittery discoquethe of the seventies here? Is there a shagmobile involved?
They're vampires, Meyers. They're very pale. They don't SPARKLE like a drag queen in a pride parade!
Meyers, my friend, you clearly have issues. And not just with your writing.
I yanked this from cleolinda, because I love her JUST THAT MUCH...and because this is too damn good not to fuck up your friend's pages with.
From an interview with Empire magazine:
"When you read the book," says Pattinson, looking appropriately pallid and interesting even without makeup, "it's like, 'Edward Cullen was so beautiful I creamed myself.' I mean, every line is like that. He's the most ridiculous person who's so amazing at everything. I think a lot of actors tried to play that aspect. I just couldn't do that. And the more I read the script, the more I hated this guy, so that's how I played him, as a manic-depressive who hates himself. Plus, he's a 108-year-old virgin so he's obviously got some issues there."
RPattz, I LOVE YOU. I love you for being REALISTIC about Edward Cullen, for accepting that he is Stephanie Meyers sekrit lover, for understanding that the author WROTE A GARY STU IN ALL BUT NAME.
I mean, at least when you got to play Cedric, you brought depth and humanity to the character. (Rowling, I love you, and I love the humility book!Cedric displayed, but Pattison brought him TO LIFE.)
Also? The manic-depressive self-hatred that Pattison is bringing to the role will become the SOLE reason I see this film. Also the 108 virgin who clearly needs unburdening of that particular problem, but don't look at me to do it!
(The Twilight fans will be more than happy to whore themselves out for the chance to "fuck a popsicle".)
Seriously, Meyers, you took the vampiric world and FUCKED IT IN THE ASS. I'm not even sure how you managed that (dildo of epic proportions, maybe?), but SIRIUSLY!
For the love of Bram Stoker and Gary Oldman (I love you, Oldman), vampires are not HARD. Well, not like that anyway, and they aren't ICE COLD either. What planet are you residing in? Did you DO your research? Wait, that's a rhetorical question.
And sparkly? SPARKLY? Are they all going through the glittery discoquethe of the seventies here? Is there a shagmobile involved?
They're vampires, Meyers. They're very pale. They don't SPARKLE like a drag queen in a pride parade!
Meyers, my friend, you clearly have issues. And not just with your writing.