Speaker: Mitt. Mitt. I'm saying it a lot because I want it to sink in how ridiculous that name is.

[kavieshana]

The preview for tonight's episode of House asked, "How far will House go to protect the patient?" To which question the answer is quite obviously "Very far, with the stressed understanding that he'll undertake that effort not because he cares about the patient or because he is in any way able to feel human emotions but because he loves a puzzle.

Comments

Re: Ugh. That only reminds me of softball.

[grrgoyl]

I've heard that as well. I've also heard that's the only reason the Right puts hot-button issues like gay marriage on every election ballot, to make their people come out and vote.

I have an idea: Why can't they just find an honest politician (let me finish), or at least one not so extreme that they stand a chance of pretending to care about all of America and not just their voter base? Why devote all your energy and resources to running nutjob slimebags, and then even more energy breaking the law with voter fraud and fixing ballot machines? Why not just play nice and do things the way they're intended to be done? Or maybe the Dems are naive for doing things that way. Or perhaps the Dems are just as guilty of it and I don't realize it.

I peeked in to my asshole brother-in-law's FB yesterday and was pleased to see he had another friend posting stuff (positively) from OWS. Mike engaged him in a (very brief) debate where he actually wrote the words "I don't think Romney's wealth is relevant." REALLY. You think a man who thinks $350,000 is "not a lot of money" has any hope of relating to the poor? Has any concerns whatsoever in politics other than keeping the cash flowing in the direction of himself and his friends? JUST ADMIT YOU'RE A FUCKING REPUBLICAN AND THEN PISS OFF, PLEASE. I'm sure eventually his OWS friend will learn the lesson I did, to screen Mike from any politics-related posts.