(Untitled)

Feb 26, 2007 10:52

doctor who

Leave a comment

Comments 6

sarichan February 26 2007, 01:14:39 UTC
Hear hear.

Reply


lordalius February 26 2007, 03:34:23 UTC
*sniffle*

Reply


antikythera February 26 2007, 03:35:00 UTC
YES. Thank you.

He always gets over it. This has happened to him so many times. Every one of them is special and irreplaceable, but he knows how to move on.

I don't know why it's a romantic idea for a girl to be 'destroyed' by losing a guy, and frankly I think Rose is too tough for that. No, she's not the #1 Positive Female Role Model from the entire run of the show, but she's come through some nasty stuff and gotten over it. I have this idea that she (and Micky and Nick, for that matter) won't be able to just leave their adventuring ways behind.

...Damn, I think I might have just invented an OT3. Um.

Reply


bramblyhedge February 26 2007, 10:46:46 UTC
YES.

p.s. MARRY ME. *CAPSLOCK LOVE*

Reply


saltmarsh February 26 2007, 17:50:31 UTC
Similarly, the last image we have of Rose - of her crying in her mother's arms - is not meant to indicate that Rose is destroyed; rather, that she is safe. Both characters will get through their grief and be all right.She is safe, you're absolutely right - but does she actually appreciate it, do you think? Because that's not the impression I took away from that scene. Since she's trapped in another universe and, I presume, basically unreachable to us as viewers as well as to the Doctor, without seeing that she gets over it and moves on, all we're left with is an image of a distraught young woman sobbing on the beach and concluding her life is empty without the Doctor ( ... )

Reply

kateorman February 26 2007, 22:56:33 UTC
Their dialogue gives a different picture of Rose's future - one filled with family and meaningful work. She's already begun to move on.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up