Nepotism much? ;o)
Knew Gardner would be off though. He doesn't want to take the flack for what's happened, although it's a free market so there's no way you can stop someone that determined to get their hands on something unfortunately. I think we've all grudingly come to realise that in the past few weeks.
As long as Glazer's spawn know their stuff and they're prepared to act in the best interests of the *club* (sorry, I still harbour resentment at the horrible way in which they ditched Maurice Watkins last yr, or announced intentions to takeover at all costs on the anniversary of the Munich air disaster, of all the inappropriate days in club history) I won't complain.
But au contraire, why put all three of them on the board and not just one? Something smells a bit fishy here. Unless they're one of those tempestuous families that doesn't talk to other family members...