"It's a pity, really. You used a number of good sources and would have written an excellent paper but you didn't... No wonder your examination of the subject was superficial and showed signs of haste."
that was my prof's comment on the essay that i did on napoleon's cult of personality for my history of propaganda class. i wish i spent more time
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
because your prof is straight up.
Reply
"It's a pity, really. You used a number of good sources and would have written an excellent paper but you didn't... No wonder your examination of the subject was superficial and showed signs of haste."
and yeah he's straight up. but i don't think he was mocking or anything like that.. i think he's just disappointed in me. i am disappointed in me too.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
also napoleon was good... but louis XIV was better.
Reply
and i agree, louix xiv was better. but the topic wanted us to explore napoleon. hmph
Reply
I love-hate it when I get called on my bullshit. This reminds of me my Law midterm. My professor's observation was, roughly: "You puzzle me, Miss V----------. This is a highly unbalanced effort. Some responses only cover the basics but some demonstrate astuteness and comprehension, indicating to me that you are capable of far more than this. I suggest you see me." I never did.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment