(no subject)
I'll wait to make a choice until everyone is back... because I've been convinced that being rash isn't beneficial.
Also a bit of something to think about and wonder...
Why do people assume someone doesn't like them if a person doesn't hang off their everyword? If that person doesn't pay every moment of their already horribly divided attention to them? Why can't some people realize that not everyone shares the same interests and so commenting on every single thing can't be good for mental health.
Why do people let things build up until it explodes and then let it hurt/damage/piss off everyone involved or within at least the blast radius? Why can't people express themselves without resorting to sarcasm that is only going to make the situation go from salvagable to intolerable?
Why is it that people who are dissatisfied with things and yet can't speak up about it have to have back ups ... like body guards almost... to go into a 'battle' with? Does it make them feel stronger if they have people of the same opinion on their side even if the only reason everyone is of the same opinion is because they were influenced by the first unhappy person?
Which only means that there is a hypocritical flaw in some people's thinking that everyone is talking behind their back when indeed they are the ones doing the talking anyways.... and does not this just breed more backstabbing? And again it just leads up to an inevitable explosion which hurts the person who was unaware.
Also a bit of something to think about and wonder...
Why do people assume someone doesn't like them if a person doesn't hang off their everyword? If that person doesn't pay every moment of their already horribly divided attention to them? Why can't some people realize that not everyone shares the same interests and so commenting on every single thing can't be good for mental health.
Why do people let things build up until it explodes and then let it hurt/damage/piss off everyone involved or within at least the blast radius? Why can't people express themselves without resorting to sarcasm that is only going to make the situation go from salvagable to intolerable?
Why is it that people who are dissatisfied with things and yet can't speak up about it have to have back ups ... like body guards almost... to go into a 'battle' with? Does it make them feel stronger if they have people of the same opinion on their side even if the only reason everyone is of the same opinion is because they were influenced by the first unhappy person?
Which only means that there is a hypocritical flaw in some people's thinking that everyone is talking behind their back when indeed they are the ones doing the talking anyways.... and does not this just breed more backstabbing? And again it just leads up to an inevitable explosion which hurts the person who was unaware.