Reactions to
the Archbishop of Canterbury's comments on Sharia law in the UK.
Of particular interest to those interest in debates centring around individual vs. group rights. Also of interest because no-one (other than the tabloids, who have 1 braincell between them) has lost their shit - yet.
Comments 2
"Under English law, people may devise their own way to settle a dispute in front of an agreed third party as long as both sides agree to the process." (emphasis mine)
In the majority of civil cases (lawsuits, divorce settlements, custody agreements, etc.) this is already done everywhere. Cases are settled and deals struck without ever going to court, so the parties can divide up property and waive rights however they see fit. My concern is the same as that of the government advisor on Muslim women: If we set up Sharia courts, many Muslim women may feel pressured by family members to use them and abide by their rulings, even if those rulings are not in the woman's best interest (or that of her children). If Muslims wish to employ attorneys who deal according to Sharia law, I'm all for it. But once we enshrine Sharia law in courts, I worry about how it will impact the "equality before the law" that Muslim women the world over are working so hard to win.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment