what happened to "I am such a modest dresser", "I can't stand skunky clothing" and "don't you just want rip those stockings of foe aesthetical reasons?" :)
my mistake. I fully admit my ignorance on distincltion and beg for clarification on how stockings are skunky and ... umm what do you call that piece is decadent. I have to acknowledge though that decadance definitely beats the hell out of stoicism...
skunky is blatantly begging for other's attention. decadent is self-directed, and in slightly better taste (more trimmings). oh, and the timeframes are shifted, too. give or take a century :)
so what you are saying, it is in the eyes of the beholder. Well, then, as far as this beholder is concerned (and I humbly beg forgivness for even questioning) this is clearly decadent and in no way shape or form skunky
oh, and the stockings were an affront to the legs. that was the aesthetic offence. in so far as i am able to discern, siski ot oformleniya ne sil'no stradajut...
well, as usual, two things: (i) I neve seen a good pare of legs that would not look good in stockings, and they were right for the time and place; (ii) please do not refer to grud' as siski - it takes it out of realm of decadance streight to realm of skunky. Admitedly, ot oformleniya eta grud' i vpryam' ne stradayet :)
С нетерпением жду третий зa сегoдня пoст ;)
Reply
na sis'kah konchaju :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(i) I neve seen a good pare of legs that would not look good in stockings, and they were right for the time and place;
(ii) please do not refer to grud' as siski - it takes it out of realm of decadance streight to realm of skunky. Admitedly, ot oformleniya eta grud' i vpryam' ne stradayet :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
fireruler can bear witness to the lack of endearment soprovozhdavshyj aquisition of "alias". at least on my part.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment