Weasel language

Mar 25, 2013 11:28


Hi Internet,

If you dog pile someone from a socially accepted unassailable position of strength you are not a hero. Particularly if you engage in dissent shaming and complain about people being mindless. Then go on to imply that this person is engaging in behaviour, or in this case thinking, that contributes to a pretty damn serious issues like ( Read more... )

via ljapp

Leave a comment

Comments 17

kainrocket March 25 2013, 00:45:24 UTC
Anybody who you feel should be able to see this is welcome to contact me. Please feel free to pass along my contact details. I trust your confidence.

Reply


friendpersonpat March 25 2013, 11:45:12 UTC
This is the classiest shit I've ever seen.

Reply

kainrocket March 25 2013, 13:44:10 UTC
Thanks!

Reply

friendpersonpat March 25 2013, 14:45:04 UTC
That was complete sarcasm.

Reply

kainrocket March 25 2013, 19:08:02 UTC
Yeah, I know. A lot of this has just been a visceral response from me.

Reply


unclejam March 25 2013, 12:05:20 UTC
Hi Cemil, I'm Tom ( ... )

Reply

kainrocket March 25 2013, 12:47:51 UTC
We appear to have a very similar background. My mum's a strong person and my dad is quite happy to have her that way. Basically I learned very early that you treat people the way you want to be treated ( ... )

Reply

unclejam March 25 2013, 13:18:37 UTC
I feel that I should be clear, and to say this publically and explicitly.

I do not deny that any given person has been bullied in their past. The fact that I have a physical scar rather than purely mental ones is my misfortune but does not mean other people were not also abused.

I believe that calling others the name of the abuser is not a good way to cause them to shape up their behavior. It would be better, for instance, to say 'I feel you're being rather unfair to James personally here, as in (short quote) and as his friend I would appreciate it if you could focus upon the topic without what seem to me to be digs at his person.' I feel that it would be better because you are focusing upon the sin and not the sinner (so to speak).

Reply


Continued, due to Vladimir Putin's character limits unclejam March 25 2013, 12:07:10 UTC
I resent the implication that I am somehow sharing in some profound evil because I share opinions with others regarding topics of great importance to me. I feel that you are telling me that if I don't shut up, I'm bad. I think this is an almost precise reversion of the position that you seem to be asserting people are holding by disagreeing (perhaps even vociferously) with James' article.

I also feel that you are asserting that you know better, and are wiser, than me, which I have found to be a common inference I draw from the rhetorical tone that you take in posts such as this one, as well as in common textual discourse. I will be explicit that I am saying that I feel this... it is a perception, a vision I have. I am not asserting that it is objectively true; I will say that, knowing myself, I feel that this is what you are doing. I will say that it is quite likely merely a manner of speech coming through from your own background, reading habits, linguistic history, etc. and it has kept me from speaking on the matter thus far. I ( ... )

Reply

Re: Continued, due to Vladimir Putin's character limits kainrocket March 25 2013, 12:23:00 UTC
Fucken Vladamir Putin.

Reply

Re: Continued, due to Vladimir Putin's character limits kainrocket March 25 2013, 13:11:00 UTC
Now for my more serious reply to here. Like I said above I don't give a damn about the frequency. People's right to live a free life where they can put forward their point of view is unassailable ( ... )

Reply

Re: Continued, due to Vladimir Putin's character limits kainrocket March 25 2013, 13:18:43 UTC
Blah I screwed up part of this. Whatever it's late and I'm tired.

Reply


litagemini March 25 2013, 14:21:22 UTC
I don't think I'll comment in James' thread, because I kind of rested my case on Feminist Frequency months ago. But for the record, it doesn't seem to me, as someone who missed the whole thing, as if any of the dissenting arguments are particularly rude. They're just dissenting arguments. The comment you replied to in particular was perfectly civil.

So I'm not getting it. Are you just upset because everyone seems to disagree with his post?

Reply

kainrocket March 25 2013, 20:19:32 UTC
You know what you're right. I had a visceral response to James reaction on Mumble and it made me see red. This post was a mistake.

Reply

litagemini March 25 2013, 21:00:29 UTC
Thank you for that. I mean, not that I'm mad or anything, I just hate to see friends fight over stuff. I like to think that people can disagree on the internet about points without it getting personal. I think gender-relation conversations get particularly heated sometimes, especially recently. I know there's been lots of times I wanted to step back from this stuff just to give myself a break.

Reply

kainrocket March 26 2013, 12:54:33 UTC
Thank you for that. I appreciate your time, your words and the fact that you acknowledged this.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up