I had a few people comment that they were sorry that I wasn't planning to write from Johar's POV again. Johar took this to mean he had fans felt he should make his fans happy and it does explain a few things about him. You also get a glimpse of what Arnell was like. Please keep in mind for the flashback Arnell is only 14 and thinks, in pure
(
Read more... )
Well, I liked this a whole lot! You are forcing mixed feelings out of me, and I like that :-) '
First I like reading about Johar's treatment of poor Gorlyn (the poooor boy!) but it's in the glimpses we get of Johar's background that the mixed feelings set in. As berthablue says, Johar IS a bastard! Sure he is, but as the same time... I can understand him a bit. It must have stung the way Arnell talked to him, I mean, it wasn't really his fault that he was the way he was. And though he might have been a stuffy bore caught in old silly traditions, he didn't seem to be more than just that, and not really a bad person. Arnell DID come across as quite unbearable and I don't wonder about Johar's bitterness.
Though, having said that, one can also assume that there IS an innate bastardness and cruelness in Johar from the start. Even if he was being badly treated by Arnell it's hardly right of him to go through with such a petty revenge when Arnell is already broken and can't defend himself - especially since Joahr isn't even sure Gorlyn really is Arnell, and so, as far as he knows he might just take it out on someone who is totally innocent (at least when it comes to that).
So, yeah, still a bastard, but it's not totally black and white, and that I like! :-)
Reply
I had a feeling most people would like Johar's treatment of Gorlyn. I'm glad about the mixed feelings. I always saw Johar as a grey character not quite to level of evil Leisa is but definatly not the white knight Neisk either.
He isn't really taking revenge on Arnell because he really doesn't believe Gorlyn is Arnell he just thinks it would be justice if he was because the Arnell would have the job he critized Johar for having. I guess maybe I didn't write that well. Anyway there will be more to see of Johar's motives and what not when he leaves which I'm thinking is going to be two or three posts away.
I enjoy total black and white characters sometimes but I always enjoy a grey one.
Reply
Yeah, he's a grey character, he's a bastard, but some of his thoughts are possible to understand, which does not excuse his behavior in any way...
Ah, yeah, that's what I meant, he has said that he doesn't believe Gorlyn is Arnell. I just meant that which ever situation it would be, it would be unfair. If he believes it's Arnell, it would be a petty revenge, if he doesn't believe that, it's even crueller, even if he has motives for it. I guess I meant that, even if I could understand - and even sympathise - with some of his feeling about Arnell from before... he's still a bastard to Gorlyn today, whatever his reasons.
Yes, usually the grey ones are the most interesting, though the black or white ones can be very funny to write - as in going all out in writing a real classic evil villain :-)
Reply
really classic evil villain is good but I find a pure as the driven snow hero to be the hardest to write.
Reply
Absolutely! I don't think I have actually ever managed to do that! The nicest person I've ever written is probably Nickel, but even he has his bad sides...
Yeah, you're right. Writing a one sided villain can be fun to both read and write. But how do you write a 'pure as the driven snow hero' without it being quite unbearable to read in the end?? :-D
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Though I must say that I often have a much easier time swallowing other unrealistic things than a very unrealistic human nature.
Reply
Leave a comment