jwz

301 Moved Permanently

May 29, 2009 11:05



301

This blog has moved to jwz.org.
This post has been archived here.
Please update your links.

301

dnalounge

Leave a comment

Comments 7

rivetpepsquad May 29 2009, 18:06:43 UTC
I have not been able to make sense of these oversights. WTF.

Reply

elusis May 29 2009, 20:28:34 UTC
It does seem really baffling.

Reply

afaict dasht May 30 2009, 01:43:22 UTC
The clubs that get mentioned all share a common source of legal representation that DNA does not share. JWZ can correct me if he sees this and knows otherwise.

-t

Reply


fantasygoat May 29 2009, 19:11:46 UTC
Weren't the other guests on the radio show the *spokespeople* for the venues in question? Someone previously mentioned a PR person might be in order.

It might be worth the money to pay someone to spend all day getting the word out about DNA and the struggles with ABC.

Reply


ext_31109 May 29 2009, 20:02:12 UTC
This article talks about drafting new rules. But a little research suggests that the ABC already has the power to issue a license perfect for a club like the DNA Lounge, (under 21s allowed, no need to sell food, etc.) it simply chooses not to. So the "new rules" needed are a change in policy at the ABC, that's your main hope. Somehow (maybe by people loudly demanding it from their elected officials) the ABC's stance on clubs has to change, or you are screwed. The lawyers are necessary to keep you open meanwhile, but a long term future requires political change. Ugh.

Reply

jwz May 29 2009, 20:30:21 UTC
The current situation -- of live venues technically being "restaurants" -- has been the status quo for literally sixty years, and ABC has only started behaving as if it is a problem recently. So yes, though the licensing situation is a little weird and nonsensical, it had been working fine for more than half a century.

Reply


mysterc May 30 2009, 02:46:20 UTC
On a plus note, your music brought a huge grin to my face.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up