(Untitled)

Dec 13, 2005 11:59

My passion is divided between intellectual and visceral. Thesis and antithesis. I wonder sometimes what synthesis would look like.

philosophy

Leave a comment

Comments 8

dankamongmen December 13 2005, 20:20:36 UTC
[the dialectic of] intellectual and visceral

the goal is to unify; that's your third eye or dhyāna as Sri Krishna called it. The finest method I've found thus far is math + drugs.

esemplastic always

Reply

dankamongmen December 13 2005, 20:22:10 UTC
p.s. cantor + turing + gödel + lsd + fasting == dharana

Reply

justben December 13 2005, 21:11:46 UTC
Speaking of Gödel, and judging from the self-referential nature of meta-ideation (ooh, I like that term), I'm pretty sure I'm going to need to grok him sooner or later. Recommended course of study from a mathematical perspective?

Reply

dankamongmen December 13 2005, 22:12:28 UTC
if you mean to grok the actual proof, it's a bit beyond your grasp for now, young grasshopper. focus elsewhere -- it's quite a long bit of very esoteric math.

if you want to understand the value of the proof, and much else besides, just read hofstadter's magnum opus. reading whitehead and russell's principia mathematica should be a milestone before the 1936 proof regarding it. the latter is, however, a nice addition to your "will one day read" pile in this $6.95 edition: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0486669807/qid=1134511910/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl14/103-4989604-1061441?n=507846&s=books&v=glance

Reply


Leave a comment

Up