(Untitled)

Feb 04, 2009 23:32

In the early days of this country, a mere two weeks would not have been sufficient to cause a President to admit wrongdoing. I am unsure whether to be impressed or disappointed; I suppose I may settle on 'impressed', as it befits the imperfect to admit so, and, by consensus and harmony with others, grow to improvement and wise governance.

Leave a comment

Comments 59

ineed_therush February 5 2009, 05:39:54 UTC
I didn't understand all of that but it sounded intelligent.

Reply

monticello_tj February 5 2009, 05:43:23 UTC
I do not know if that was a compliment to me or an insult to yourself.

Reply

ineed_therush February 5 2009, 05:44:23 UTC
[laughs]

Good one. You look a lot like someone I would have studied in History class.

Reply

monticello_tj February 5 2009, 05:46:42 UTC
In all truth, you most likely have.

Reply


fever_crusade February 5 2009, 06:16:25 UTC
I suppose better to admit wrongdoing than to deny it.

Reply

monticello_tj February 5 2009, 06:18:24 UTC
Perhaps; better still to avoid the wrongdoing entirely.

Reply

fever_crusade February 5 2009, 06:20:09 UTC
True too. But no one is immune to making mistakes, even though we put on a pedestal (or those who place themselves on one).

Reply

monticello_tj February 5 2009, 06:24:15 UTC
No one is immune from mistakes indeed, and, by extension, the larger electorate is not immune from mistake; I find myself relieved that the new President-elect seeks to compromise, rather than use his 'mandate', if you will, for a personal agenda.

Reply


hank_callahan February 5 2009, 14:31:15 UTC
You talkin' 'bout Obama's screwup with Tom Daschle?

Reply

monticello_tj February 5 2009, 15:11:00 UTC
I am.

Failure to pay taxes would hardly have created the public scandal it does now in the past. Those standards, though, are esoteric and no longer hold sway.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up