Title: That's My Boy, Pt. II
Author:
thelonejuliet Characters: Sam, Dean
Pairing: Sam/Dean
Word Count: 1,334
Rating: R
Warnings: Boy kissing, incest, handjobs
Spoilers: Scarecrow
Disclaimer: These boys are not mine. They're Kripke's. But, they have more fun when I play with them. ;)
Beta:
confused_one06Author's Note(s): This was written because of
dreamlittleyo. Seriously, it's all her
(
Read more... )
'kay, first of all? Squee, you included bitchy snarkiness from what's-her-toes! (Loved the detail of Dean not remembering her name, because I sure as hell couldn't). Yes! And so sweet. Hee. My absolute favorite moment was when Sam bit Dean to bring him back, the: “You weren’t with me,” he murmured.. It was just perfect for that moment, and of course Sam is going to notice that Dean is a million miles away!
I'm at the wrong computer for graphics (this was my break in between Professional Responsibility homework and Estates & Trusts reading, so I'm on my school computer)--but shall have my half up and linking as soon as I get the chance to switch over. *hugs you*
Reply
I'm so happy you like it! I was really unsure about it, so...double yay!
And, yeah, Sam so would do that. Dammit, he was giving Dean a handjob - and, most likely, a frickin' awesome one - and Dean needs to pay attention! Lol. It's the right thing to do! *grin*
Take your time, no rush. :) I'll wait until you get your half up before I post to any comms. *nods* That way everyone can love you!
*hugs back* I really am excited that you like this - I'm practically bouncing! *beams*
Reply
Reply
I've seen all the comments on the picture! Kudos! :)
Reply
Reply
Sorry 'bout those bridges. Where are you exactly?
I'll post the story to the comms and add that link up into the story post! Yaaaaay! :)
Reply
Reply
Yeah, they've been starting to work on our bridges recently too - which is going to suck. Having Cincinnati on a river? Not really convenient. Traffic is already awful as it is, but now they want to work on the Double Decker (I think that's what it's called) which is the bridge for both I-71 and I-75. So, if they do that? There's no way for hundreds of people to get to/from work in Cincinnati, if they live in KY - like I do.
Sorry about your troubles... *hugs*
Reply
I can't get writing on it, because I don't have Photoshop on my laptop yet. So, I can work on it later...but I like that image. :)
Reply
I've tried to attack some of them for iconning, and have run into a problem that I totally should've seen coming: the linearts don't want to shrink down well into 100x100 GIFs. They're giving me a right frustrating time, they are, and it's in photoshop. I haven't given up yet, but yeah... makes me all the happier for this. *points to your icon and squees*
Reply
*Proffers The Pretty*
I can try to make the rest of them into icons. I should be getting Photoshop for my birthday in, like, two weeks. (21! Woohoo!) So, I can attempt then.
Reply
Yay photoshop! And happy 21st birthday (whether I'm way late or way early... *sheepish face), wooh! It occurred to me just this morning that part of my problem might be that I'm trying to tweak the pictures small enough for LJ icons using the JPGs and GIFs, rather than the uncompressed TIF format I've got saved (ginormous as they are that way), and that it might give me better luck. So I'm all newly hopeful--we shall have a successful batch of icons yet! (just as soon as I finish my Evidence reading... *sheepish face*)
You! Are made of awesome!
Reply
You're a little early on the birthday wishes (not until Sept. 12), but thank you!
Literally, all I did with this, is crop it. Maybe because it was small enough, with the dimensions on my journal, to do it. I dunno. But, yeah, they'd all make great icons. :)
Evidence reading?! Gah. That sounds boring as hell. Even worse than the playwrighting habits of the 17th century. *nods*
*blush* Thanks. But, you're awesomer. :) lol
Reply
The evidence reading is actually not to bed so far -- the subject matter is kind of a giant, intricate puzzle, and my textbook is very wry and straightforward and cuts out a lot of the bullshit, so... happy, happy things. *nod*
Oh yeah? Well you're the awesomest. *cling*
Reply
Well, that's good! Yay for non-confusing textbooks! I swear, whoever wrote my Theatre History textbook was on something - and not the good stuff either, but the cheap, dollar-store-version of the drugs. In one chapter (Elisabethans, blegh), it talked about Shakespeare and then moved on to Marlowe or theatre design or something. And then? WENT BACK TO SHAKESPEARE! Gah! I was ready to tear my hair out.
Again with the clinging! *pause*..... *clings to you tighter*
You're the awesomester!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment