Leave a comment

Comments 22

mactavish April 3 2008, 16:14:06 UTC
I really had to think about what seemed so very wrong -- there's no beard!

Reply

jrittenhouse April 3 2008, 17:30:41 UTC
Nope, none.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

jrittenhouse April 3 2008, 22:10:06 UTC
looks pretty stubbly to me, but...

Reply


jcw_da_dmg April 3 2008, 16:16:36 UTC
Still looks like Jim to me - but I've known you quite a while.

Reply


shelleybear April 3 2008, 17:37:35 UTC

kestrels_nest April 3 2008, 19:20:52 UTC
Looks like you to me, too...but am I the only one to think that thing looks entirely too much like a wimple?

Reply

jrittenhouse April 3 2008, 22:07:57 UTC
Wimples - um, not so much.

Reply

kestrels_nest April 3 2008, 23:31:27 UTC
I was thinking of the 9th - 11th c. Saxon version, which was basically a band over the head and under the chin to which the veil was pinned. The one you found would be about 14th c.. And I'm embarrassed to admit I didn't even think of the later version.....

And now you know just what kind of history-geek trivia I carry around in my head. :)

Reply

jrittenhouse April 3 2008, 23:51:08 UTC
About the same as mine; it's a true mathom-house.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up