not understandable...
sometimes I really can't understand people's standard of "mint condition"...
just bought a psp off kijiji...
which clearly stated that it is mint condition and hardly used...
I even confirmed it with the seller before we setup a meet...
he said "only played for a few weeks, no scratch"...
well... when I saw the "actual thing" today...
it was covered with dust and the analog stick has some unknown yellow stain all over it...
worst of all... not only the silver ring on the back where the psp logo is covered with scratches...
the screen itself has a noticeable long scratch mark from left top corner towards the center...
plus a lot of minor scratches... there were no protector screen... obviously...
and the case itself has a little crack...
so which part of earth does all the above indicates that it is "mint condition and hardly used"???
like... hello...?!!
just bought a psp off kijiji...
which clearly stated that it is mint condition and hardly used...
I even confirmed it with the seller before we setup a meet...
he said "only played for a few weeks, no scratch"...
well... when I saw the "actual thing" today...
it was covered with dust and the analog stick has some unknown yellow stain all over it...
worst of all... not only the silver ring on the back where the psp logo is covered with scratches...
the screen itself has a noticeable long scratch mark from left top corner towards the center...
plus a lot of minor scratches... there were no protector screen... obviously...
and the case itself has a little crack...
so which part of earth does all the above indicates that it is "mint condition and hardly used"???
like... hello...?!!