No, it is normal men (yes, I am not PC: transgender are deviation of norm) pretending to be transgender, in the women's room - who are a problem. Normal in equipment-sense, and definitely abnormal - in mental. Which we know - happens a lot, only usually unreported. Ask any woman - how many times in her life she encountered various degree of sexual aggression - from exhibitionists to violent attacker - if she is honest, you will be amazed. Why give predators legal excuse to expand their hunting grounds where there was none before?
No, I don't think it is possible to enforce the new/old law. But I do think it was necessary to reverse Obama's nonsense.
Personal note: maybe this need to feel safe in a place where one is vulnerable is instinctively understood only by a person who is vulnerable? In any case, I find most men become suddenly blind, num and thick as a log when subject does not concern their own safety and vulnerability.
Example: questionable looking guy with a beard in the "nursing mothers" area at the mall. (For those who haven't been there-- it's a place to corral your kids, change diapers, sit down and nurse, and let over-excited kids hide in a corner for a bit.)
Exactly. My concern was that there'd be men pretending to be trans (basically cross-dressing) and walking into women's bathrooms. Worse yet, the women would be called transphobic for not letting them in.
The question is, how do you know the difference between a cross-dresser and someone who really is trans?
I'd have to agree with this comment's assessment, we as a society, arguably as a species, still have a big problem with rape and child abuse -- restrooms, etc. still being excellent stalking grounds for that. Of course it's not always happening, but it happens.
People waiting outside, or inside them, sometimes for hours, just for victims is a distinct pattern. We live in a world where people call libraries to hear a woman's voice in order to masturbate to it (and are presumably too cheap to call for proper phone sex); I read about that here on LiveJournal. Every time I think I've lowered the bar enough for humanity, the limbo continues to surprise.
People do use restrooms for consensual sex on a regular basis, as well as think of them as sexual places (your genitals are exposed, there are scents, golden showers, scat, etc) and that's with the current gender division -- so your "dick wagging" remark is entirely off basis (see: glory hole). https://en.wikipedia.
( ... )
No, I don't think it is possible to enforce the new/old law. But I do think it was necessary to reverse Obama's nonsense.
Personal note: maybe this need to feel safe in a place where one is vulnerable is instinctively understood only by a person who is vulnerable? In any case, I find most men become suddenly blind, num and thick as a log when subject does not concern their own safety and vulnerability.
N0o, I am not with you on this issue.
Reply
That was not fun.
Reply
Reply
The question is, how do you know the difference between a cross-dresser and someone who really is trans?
Reply
for instance:
https://www.fpiw.org/blog/2016/02/25/convicted-sex-offender-seeks-access-to-womens-locker-rooms-through-bathroom-law/
Reply
Reply
People waiting outside, or inside them, sometimes for hours, just for victims is a distinct pattern. We live in a world where people call libraries to hear a woman's voice in order to masturbate to it (and are presumably too cheap to call for proper phone sex); I read about that here on LiveJournal. Every time I think I've lowered the bar enough for humanity, the limbo continues to surprise.
People do use restrooms for consensual sex on a regular basis, as well as think of them as sexual places (your genitals are exposed, there are scents, golden showers, scat, etc) and that's with the current gender division -- so your "dick wagging" remark is entirely off basis (see: glory hole). https://en.wikipedia. ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment