Georgia State Court decides Obama is NOT eligible for Presidency
The details here, by Craig Andreson in "Obama Eligibility Court Case ... Blow by Blow" (January 26th, 2012, The National Patriot
http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138
The judge first determined that Obama's father had never been an American citizen.
Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
This is important, because there is an exception to the citizenship requirement for "natural birth" in that if your parents became US Citizens, you are still "natural born." This is in the Constitution for several reasons, one being that otherwise there would have been no pool from which Presidents could be selected until well into the 19th century (Americans born before 1776 were, of course, born British subjects -- ironically, the same nationality as was born Obama's father).
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that the true owner of the number was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
This is highly important, because it means that Barack Obama was never assigned a legitimate Social Security number. He must have gotten one through fraud -- at the minimum, through some fraudulent friend who said "I'll take care of it" or something to the effect, and recycled a Social Security number belonging to a dead man. 1890 sounds about right -- a man born in 1890 would have died just before or soon after Obama's birth. Note that the fraud might have been committed by his mother or grandmother -- both of whom are now conveniently dead -- in which case Barack might not have known this.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Soetoro, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.
This closes Barack Obama's loophole -- he must have commited the fraud knowingly if it was done in 1977, at which point Obama was already 15-16 years old. In partial exculpation of this, he was a minor at the time, and was probably manipulated into this by adults.
It does raise an interesting question. Why were the adults in Obama's life going to all this trouble to falsely gain him citizenship, when his long residence and birth to someone who presumably was an American citizen (his mother), would have enabled him to gain citizenship (and a social security number) legitimately?
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Indeed, were the subject of the inquiry just Barry Obama, that guy down the block, this would almost certainly be done. The main reason it isn't happening (or likely to happen) is that the subject of the inquiry is the President of the United States, the man in charge of our immigration system.
Which is a good example of "political corruption" ...
Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.
One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.
WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?
Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.
One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.
Indeed.
Conclusion
The interesting point is that Obama ordered his attorneys not to show up to defend him. I'm trying to figure out why he did this. Doesn't the Georgian decision mean that Obama won't be on the ballot in Georgia in 2012? And couldn't similar decisions come out of other State courts, given that Obama's lack of defense will prevent him from appealing the decision?
Does Obama simply not care if he wins or loses the electoral vote in 2012? Or is he concealing something so illegal that he more greatly fears what might emerge from a contested court case?
With this uncontested decision, the Birthers now have the presumption of truth in their favor. Though I doubt that the Democrats will pay attention to it unless the Republicans force them to do so.
What the Republicans should be doing is working to obtain similar decisions from numerous states with the goal of forcing Obama off the ballot in enough states that he cannot win the 2012 election. Doing this would also preserve the Constitution, already-damaged as it is by the fact that we have permitted an impostor to perform the duties of President of the United States of America for over three years.
Doing so would also provide a legal basis to challenge every single act Obama has performed as President. At a minimum, it would allow repeal of all his Executive Orders, and challenge of any new ones.
What Obama should do is step down to permit a qualified person to assume the office of Prsident of the United States. I'm not clear on whether or not this would be Joe Biden: a case could be made that Biden, as running-mate of an unqualified candidate, is himself unqualified, but OTOH the Vice-President theoretically runs alone and hence would still be qualified.
None of this will happen, of course (save for the Republicans trying to get him off the ballot in as many states as possible). What will happen is that Obama will arrogantly and selfishly cling to power at the expense of his Party and his (pretended) country; the Republicans will want him to run because they will see him as easier to defeat than the alternatives (especially with this albatross materialized around his neck), and so the fait accompli of 2008 will stand.
And the Republic die by another few inches :(
http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138
The judge first determined that Obama's father had never been an American citizen.
Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
This is important, because there is an exception to the citizenship requirement for "natural birth" in that if your parents became US Citizens, you are still "natural born." This is in the Constitution for several reasons, one being that otherwise there would have been no pool from which Presidents could be selected until well into the 19th century (Americans born before 1776 were, of course, born British subjects -- ironically, the same nationality as was born Obama's father).
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that the true owner of the number was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
This is highly important, because it means that Barack Obama was never assigned a legitimate Social Security number. He must have gotten one through fraud -- at the minimum, through some fraudulent friend who said "I'll take care of it" or something to the effect, and recycled a Social Security number belonging to a dead man. 1890 sounds about right -- a man born in 1890 would have died just before or soon after Obama's birth. Note that the fraud might have been committed by his mother or grandmother -- both of whom are now conveniently dead -- in which case Barack might not have known this.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Soetoro, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.
This closes Barack Obama's loophole -- he must have commited the fraud knowingly if it was done in 1977, at which point Obama was already 15-16 years old. In partial exculpation of this, he was a minor at the time, and was probably manipulated into this by adults.
It does raise an interesting question. Why were the adults in Obama's life going to all this trouble to falsely gain him citizenship, when his long residence and birth to someone who presumably was an American citizen (his mother), would have enabled him to gain citizenship (and a social security number) legitimately?
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Indeed, were the subject of the inquiry just Barry Obama, that guy down the block, this would almost certainly be done. The main reason it isn't happening (or likely to happen) is that the subject of the inquiry is the President of the United States, the man in charge of our immigration system.
Which is a good example of "political corruption" ...
Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.
One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.
WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?
Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.
One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.
Indeed.
Conclusion
The interesting point is that Obama ordered his attorneys not to show up to defend him. I'm trying to figure out why he did this. Doesn't the Georgian decision mean that Obama won't be on the ballot in Georgia in 2012? And couldn't similar decisions come out of other State courts, given that Obama's lack of defense will prevent him from appealing the decision?
Does Obama simply not care if he wins or loses the electoral vote in 2012? Or is he concealing something so illegal that he more greatly fears what might emerge from a contested court case?
With this uncontested decision, the Birthers now have the presumption of truth in their favor. Though I doubt that the Democrats will pay attention to it unless the Republicans force them to do so.
What the Republicans should be doing is working to obtain similar decisions from numerous states with the goal of forcing Obama off the ballot in enough states that he cannot win the 2012 election. Doing this would also preserve the Constitution, already-damaged as it is by the fact that we have permitted an impostor to perform the duties of President of the United States of America for over three years.
Doing so would also provide a legal basis to challenge every single act Obama has performed as President. At a minimum, it would allow repeal of all his Executive Orders, and challenge of any new ones.
What Obama should do is step down to permit a qualified person to assume the office of Prsident of the United States. I'm not clear on whether or not this would be Joe Biden: a case could be made that Biden, as running-mate of an unqualified candidate, is himself unqualified, but OTOH the Vice-President theoretically runs alone and hence would still be qualified.
None of this will happen, of course (save for the Republicans trying to get him off the ballot in as many states as possible). What will happen is that Obama will arrogantly and selfishly cling to power at the expense of his Party and his (pretended) country; the Republicans will want him to run because they will see him as easier to defeat than the alternatives (especially with this albatross materialized around his neck), and so the fait accompli of 2008 will stand.
And the Republic die by another few inches :(