BackgroundAs I'm sure everyone knows by now, Barack Obama has ordered the abandonment of the American Constellation rocket program, whose principal aim was the American return to the Moon (
http://www.space.com/news/obama-nasa-space-plan-reactions-100128
( Read more... )
Of course, they would love to hold America back from Lunar colonization. They, too, have scientists who understand the vital importance of Luna in any colonization of the Solar System, and thus they do not want an American-dominated Moon.
The Moon might well be used as a military base also. Many people today regard this as a silly Cold War worry, but it actually makes a lot of sense. Unlike orbital bases, a Lunar base could be dug in deep under miles of crust (indeed, Luna probably has ideally-suited natural cavern systems in which such a base might be sited), and would have easy access to metals for the construction of heavy equipment. And while it's true that you're shooting up a gravity well at the Earth, it's up a shallow well into a deeper one.
The real disadvantage is days to hours of lag between launch and impact, which is a problem if you're shooting against active defenses. But if you're not ... or if you have enough firepower that you can saturate them, that's not such a problem assuming that you are shooting against unmaneuverable targets (such as cities, factories or bases).
You could also have unlimited ammunition if you try Heinlein's strategy (from The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress) of throwing rocks from a mass driver. Sure, an enemy could knock out your big and thus vulnerable mass driver, but this assumes that your enemy has the ability to reach the Moon. Not all enemies do. And if you have active defenses around the mass driver, the enemy also has to be able to reach the Moon with a sizable strike.
Reply
Reply
Reply
- lack of cap letters is because i have a delicious sandwich in hand....
Reply
Something similar is the tendency to think that anything our ancestors believed must by definition be "superstitious," "stupid," "childish," or otherwise ridiculous simply because they and their culture existed when our species was much younger. Another is the idea that peoples who are without our wonderful advanced technology are therefore technologically impaired and thus unable to do anything of note. Captain James Cook got clubbed on the head and a knife in the chest, which thereby permanently put his career on hold, at the hands of "primitive savages" in spite of the fact that their technology was so "inferior" to that of the British. And a black widow spider, a member of a subphylum of creatures that first walked the Earth around 420 million years ago, during the Silurian Period of the Paleozoic Era, has been known to flatten grown men who, in spite of all their advanced technology, turn out to be no match for a soft little thing with only tiny fangs for weapons. Assuming somebody/something is obsolete/inferior/of no consequence seems to be an intellectual sin much in vogue for a long, long time. Disrespect for Cold War psyops weapons, tactics, and strategies is just another expression of that sort of sin -- but it can kill us dead if we aren't careful.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment