I was writing a comment to
thimpressionist and thought maybe I'd make a post about this because I've been thinking about it a bit and was wondering what anyone else's thoughts were on the matter. (Also, I should be doing the dishes and also my bit for the
tg-crack round robin, but instead I'm doing this. Anything to procrastinate!)
Brothers. A discussion in which I
(
Read more... )
Oh, undoubtedly; mention sexuality and it suddenly becomes the main focus of the thing, whether you mean it to or not. And as for putting people off the thing, I've heard more than one person say that they think that that's why Hellbent wasn't very big - it's a gore movie with gay main characters - which probably put off the usual young male audience.
There's only one show I can think of (Taggart) which plays its gay character without any fuss over his sexuality; he's a copper, and he's gay - and that's it. It comes up in the odd episode, but you could see several without knowing that about him.
Why aren't men allowed to be close, just men, no qualifiers? Why is this so problematic?
I would love to have a more complicated reason than this, but I suspect it's just that people attribute virtually everything to sex. [The worst part is that they're usually right.]
Reply
Ahem. Anyway, I've not seen much of Taggart - not enough to notice that gay cop (or even remember much of the show).
I suspect it's just that people attribute virtually everything to sex. Yeah, I do wonder if, as a slasher, I can't really complain about this or I'm contributing to that factor? As in, that people can't be close without there being some sexual attraction there - which I totally don't believe is true. But I guess with the lack of same-sex couples depicted, part of the appeal of wearing slash googles is that you create more same-sex couples by reading them that way. Maybe if there wasn't such a lack, then I could just take brothers' relationships on face value.
Reply
Leave a comment