I am still anonymous, why would you even suspect that I have a livejournal to begin with? Besides that, though, you yourself said you were aware of a flaw and were looking into correcting it. Why would you want to correct it? Because it could be exploited, there is no other reason. So nothing has changed from what you've said, you're still aware of the flaw and should still want to correct it. I have no problem with you running polls, i happily participated in them and was curious about the results until i realized that it was allowing me to vote multiple times(cookies are fairly restricted on my computer as a default). You suggest that you're not angry or sad, but your words appear nothing but angry, but you know that. Also, you are only taking it from that perspective, seeing as your other perspective is "I told you that i was glad you felt good about it" -Joe in response to "I don't necessarily approve of my own behavior" -Me It's at best passive aggressive of you. Really, sorry if it terribly inconvenienced you, like i said, the ratio was a clear 1 to 1 to 4 before anything was done to it. And you know that it's not a "condition", I wasn't trying to suggest that so your skepticism is warranted only if you took me to be trying to say that I have a legitimate problem, but it's just similar in nature to something so I made what seemed an apt comparison. If you understood my words however, you should appreciate that my compulsion is satisfied as far as it can be, you are aware of the problem and its ramifications and that's all it was driving at, so not running polls is a decision that should be based not at all off of me. Like i said, I personally enjoyed having them when you first started doing them a few strips ago.
I would suspect you have a Livejournal because you're posting here and because you said that you wanted to make sure you knew that you did it.
What has changed is the results of the polls. I can no longer use that information.
I'm insulted that you're accusing me of being passive aggressive. I was sincere in everything I said. I thought I was being very fair and diplomatic to you. ...I thought I was being nice. I guess not.
Thank you for letting me know about the faulty data.
I have no problem with you running polls, i happily participated in them and was curious about the results until i realized that it was allowing me to vote multiple times(cookies are fairly restricted on my computer as a default). You suggest that you're not angry or sad, but your words appear nothing but angry, but you know that.
Also, you are only taking it from that perspective, seeing as your other perspective is
"I told you that i was glad you felt good about it" -Joe
in response to
"I don't necessarily approve of my own behavior" -Me
It's at best passive aggressive of you. Really, sorry if it terribly inconvenienced you, like i said, the ratio was a clear 1 to 1 to 4 before anything was done to it.
And you know that it's not a "condition", I wasn't trying to suggest that so your skepticism is warranted only if you took me to be trying to say that I have a legitimate problem, but it's just similar in nature to something so I made what seemed an apt comparison. If you understood my words however, you should appreciate that my compulsion is satisfied as far as it can be, you are aware of the problem and its ramifications and that's all it was driving at, so not running polls is a decision that should be based not at all off of me. Like i said, I personally enjoyed having them when you first started doing them a few strips ago.
Reply
What has changed is the results of the polls. I can no longer use that information.
I'm insulted that you're accusing me of being passive aggressive. I was sincere in everything I said. I thought I was being very fair and diplomatic to you. ...I thought I was being nice. I guess not.
Thank you for letting me know about the faulty data.
Take care.
Reply
Leave a comment