hmmm. It seems to be the trendy thing in America to be anti-war. It looks as if every group that tries so desperately to be different from everyone is making up the vast majority of the anti-war crowd. Look at yourselves, you blocked intersections today, people just trying to get to work but you can't let them because you have to tell everyone in the world that this war's for oil! oh brother, you guys have got way too much to learn and I can't teach you it. Stalin helped us in World war two how? Please tell me how. find the answer to this and you'll see that the point of saying he helped us isn't a very good point at all.
yesssss I WIN I WIN I WIN AGAINNNNNNNNN AHAHAHAHHAHAHA
get off your high horse you think being anti-war is TRENDY??? it's RIGHT. it's MORAL. it's about preserving lives... of innocents and our own troops. 4 Americans and 12 Brits died today... in the name of Bush's war. since when has Saddam been a threat? the Gulf War left his army in shambles. it's funny how the U.S. strikes against tiny, defenseless countries to try to appear all high and mighty... Afghanistan, now Iraq. let's see America strike against China, which also has an oppressive regime, or maybe North Korea. Oh no, America won't do that; why? because they'll bomb us back, and... they have no resources for us to use. i don't think Bush goes to bed every day thinking about the suffering the Iraqi people are going through. all that's on his mind is $$$$OIL$$$$. if he gave a shit, then why did his dad leave them to suffer during the Gulf War? why were Kuwaitis liberated and then left all by themselves? America should not be a Global Bully, or Policeman. It's not right. And I won't support it.
First off high horse??? You guys come over here and call me a redneck and all this shit when I did nothing but oppose your views. It's pretty funny how you stick up for Iraq and say how bad war is because there's innoncent people getting involved, but then you go on to say that America should bomb China and North Korea. Hmmmm, what did we do 50 years ago? Remember that war called the Korean war where we bombed north korea? Do you want to know why we don't bomb them now? Because they are not a threat! The North-koreans are very stubborn people, but they're gov't has been that way forever. We tried changing things around there and it just didn't work. I agree that they can pose a threat, and that we should do something about it afterrr the war in Iraq. Also mind you this: There's millions of Iraqis and North Koreans who depend on the food that the U.S. provides for them everyday. Also mind you that Iraq is a war-torn country, WHy? BECAUSE SADDAM HAS SENT THEM TO FUCKING WAR SO MANY GODDAMN TIMES! THEY KNOW THAT this will be the end of
( ... )
this act of war is infuriated iraqis and muslims alike, as well as our global allies. we are acting on our own and that is a major mistake. countries that were sympathetic for us after 9/11 now don't give a shit about us. when the American empire is brought down, nobody will be there to help. and i can assure you America probably won't stay in power for very long. Al-Qaida is getting a rise in people signing up for it, and America is sure to get a huge terrorist attack in the coming years. this is all because of Bush's idiotic war plan when he had the option to resolve this touchy issue peacefully. and, can you give me examples of us giving food to N.Koreans? You're just making that up. get your facts straight. and do you think it's okay for us , while we're in our "peaceful homes" to be waging full war, killing innocents and our own troops, thousands of miles away??? we are detached to global affairs, and it's sick. we can bomb the powerless countries, but they can't bomb us. hypocritical if you ask me. AmeriKKKa sucks.
The "Coalition" is bullshitinsult2injuryMarch 22 2003, 03:22:37 UTC
Bush is simply touting the "Coalition of the Willing" as "support is on his side" but that is clearly wrong. The Coalition is mostly comprised of tiny countries that were bribed into "supporting" the war in exchange for monetary aid. Here is the list of the Coalition
( ... )
Re: The "Coalition" is bullshitjmaddMarch 22 2003, 09:21:42 UTC
Let me give you one good reason why none of the other countries in the U.N. or in the world or even close to being as important as the U.S.: The first U.N. (the league of nations) failed miserably for one reason, there was no U.S. The U.S.A represents more to the people of the world then the U.N. ever will. To say that the total population of the countries who's leaders oppose us is like saying that the total population of America supports it. The world's divided but I've yet to hear why other than the inspectors(who aren't going to accomplish shit, we found more in 2 days then they did in 6 months) should keep working and we shouldn't have some war for oil which is obscure. Please Someone give me a good solid answer on why this war in unjust.
I personally think that this war is far overdue and that it should of been done in 1998 or better yet we should've just finished the job in 91
Re: The "Coalition" is bullshitinsult2injuryMarch 22 2003, 13:58:12 UTC
To say that the total population of the countries who's leaders oppose us is like saying that the total population of America supports it.Then you're also criticizing the American Government in which you claim that you support. I got the "1.8 billion" number from a news conference at the Pentagon. THEY are flaunting the fact that they have a certain "population" on their side. Simply put, it's a number game. My reply that there are "4 billion" against it was tongue-in-cheek, albeit somewhat true
( ... )
Reply
It seems to be the trendy thing in America to be anti-war. It looks as if every group that tries so desperately to be different from everyone is making up the vast majority of the anti-war crowd. Look at yourselves, you blocked intersections today, people just trying to get to work but you can't let them because you have to tell everyone in the world that this war's for oil!
oh brother, you guys have got way too much to learn and I can't teach you it.
Stalin helped us in World war two how?
Please tell me how. find the answer to this and you'll see that the point of saying he helped us isn't a very good point at all.
yesssss I WIN I WIN I WIN AGAINNNNNNNNN AHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Reply
you think being anti-war is TRENDY??? it's RIGHT. it's MORAL. it's about preserving lives... of innocents and our own troops. 4 Americans and 12 Brits died today... in the name of Bush's war. since when has Saddam been a threat? the Gulf War left his army in shambles. it's funny how the U.S. strikes against tiny, defenseless countries to try to appear all high and mighty... Afghanistan, now Iraq. let's see America strike against China, which also has an oppressive regime, or maybe North Korea. Oh no, America won't do that; why? because they'll bomb us back, and... they have no resources for us to use. i don't think Bush goes to bed every day thinking about the suffering the Iraqi people are going through. all that's on his mind is $$$$OIL$$$$. if he gave a shit, then why did his dad leave them to suffer during the Gulf War? why were Kuwaitis liberated and then left all by themselves? America should not be a Global Bully, or Policeman. It's not right. And I won't support it.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I personally think that this war is far overdue and that it should of been done in 1998 or better yet we should've just finished the job in 91
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment