The Way of Things, Chapter 32

Nov 08, 2007 07:11

Peter rubbed his eyes blearily, another long day without Rose done and gone. He’d come home and, after a light supper, had spent a few hours working at the table in the kitchen. After re-reading the same report for the fourth time, he’d given up, moving to stretch out on the sofa. He had a new book he’d been meaning to read for ages, and hoped it ( Read more... )

the way of things, kendal, rose, blackpool, carlisle, year 1, poor peter, post-dd

Leave a comment

Re: Comment 2 of 3 jlrpuck November 8 2007, 16:28:33 UTC
Nice detail, if a bit sad. I think another "poor Peter" thought is in the works.

Poor Peter, indeed. He really does have a miserably lonely life; which is such a waste, because I see him as such a...valuable human being, really. He's funny, he's smart, he's fiercely loyal to those who he would consider a friend. But all outsiders see is the wall he's built to protect himself from being hurt, and they're not willing to wade through the briar patch to delve any further. *sigh* Poor Peter.

It's nice to see Peter as a mentor of sorts.

I genuinely think he wants to help people--well, people he thinks are smarter than the average bear. It's just...he's not necessarily been in a good mental space to do that. Again--Poor Peter. So much untapped, unrealize potential--mentoring not least among what he has to offer (you! chicklet73--and others! get your mind out of the gutter!)

So says that pile of laundry... ;0)

Bwah! [I'm not ignoring the intervening comments...it's just I've nothing of substance to add to them! :)]

The return of the snark!

It made me a very, very happy camper indeed to write Snarky!Peter again. Very happy.

Not the time for chess strategy, Peter!

Today's conversation topic: Does Peter play chess? Discuss.

For some reason, I didn't picture him with neat handwriting.

Here's my thinking on it--because I know it'll get discussed. :) In the normal course of business, when Peter's just Peter, I see his handwriting as a bit sloppy. But when he's tightly focused--when he's trying to rein himself in, to keep control, to at least *appear* as though he's fine or not affected--I see his handwriting as being very neat, very precise...very deliberate. It's another reflection of his attempt to control what's going on, when things around him are a bit wacky, I suppose--although my degree was most assuredly not in psychology, so I'm totally making that last part up. ;)

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

Re: Comment 2 of 3 principia November 8 2007, 17:12:45 UTC
Not neccesarily disliked, just...of no value. And that would have to be a killer. Poor Peter.

Not even worth being actively disliked? Small wonder he's picked up sarcastic provocation as a habit. He may not be liked, but he's sure as hell not going to be ignored.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

Re: Comment 2 of 3 principia November 8 2007, 21:53:25 UTC
Funny. He's an expert at giving the silent treatment - but it was probably being subjected to it growing up that caused him such grief.

There's a difference between being actively punished with silence and simply being ignored. Which do you think his 'rentals tended more towards?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

Re: Comment 2 of 3 principia November 9 2007, 15:35:27 UTC
However, as a child, he could have internalized this as some sort of 'punishment' for sins he must have committed - even if he didn't know what they were.

Baby monkey, man, baby monkey. :(

Though it may have seemed that way to Rose, I think he was more just retreating, drawing back out of self-preservation, rather than giving her the cold shoulder on purpose to make her feel bad.

In my experience with seeing people get/give the silent treatment, it's customary that one keep active and be obviously, deliberately not speaking to the person, versus leaning against the wall and simply not saying anything.

I don't know what is going on with Rose, because as much as she seems to think she's acknowledged her part in the current situation, and recognizes that the repair work is hers to initiate, she seems bound and determined not to be the one to apologize, not the one to act first. Pattern from when she and Jackie would row when she was a kid, or a pattern leftover from her time with the Doctor?

Reply

Re: Comment 2 of 3 jlrpuck November 9 2007, 18:53:48 UTC
Baby monkey, man, baby monkey.

Gah! No! Not the baby monkeys again! That depresses the hell out of me! Er, even though I agree, the silence was because he was ignored, not because he was being punished.

Pattern from when she and Jackie would row when she was a kid, or a pattern leftover from her time with the Doctor?

Hmm. Good question.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

Re: Comment 2 of 3 principia November 9 2007, 21:36:47 UTC
One wonders if that realization was even worse than thinking the neglect was a repercussion for what he did.

What, if they can't even be arsed enough to be actively punishing you? Worse.

Ergo so many children whose parents divorce assuming it's at least partially their part, even though that's ridiculous?

As a child of divorced parents (first kid in my class with divorced parents, yay), I can say that it's not utterly out of the question that a specific individual child would be a sufficient stressor to cause disruptions in a marriage, but it's more common that it's the concept of kids in general that would lead to a divorce versus a given kid.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

Re: Comment 2 of 3 principia November 9 2007, 21:41:55 UTC
Ooh, good question. I remember the Doctor apologizing all the time ("I'm sorry. I'm so sorry.") to people. Perhaps Rose got out of the habit because she never got the chance to do so before he did? *g*

I meant more in terms of her direct conflicts with the Doctor - not that she and Ten fought as notably as she and Nine had - he generally made the initial overtures of reconciliation, regardless of how in the wrong she was (e.g., Father's Day).

Reply

Re: Comment 2 of 3 principia November 8 2007, 17:11:22 UTC
Poor Peter, indeed. He really does have a miserably lonely life; which is such a waste, because I see him as such a...valuable human being, really.

He clearly needs someone to play with. Here's hoping Rose will fit the bill.

Today's conversation topic: Does Peter play chess? Discuss.

Speed chess all the way, baby. But he doesn't spend his time on BoardgameGeek arguing over whether Chess should be the fixed standard of a perfect 10 game.

I see his handwriting as being very neat, very precise...very deliberate.

The manual equivalent of enunciating very sharply. Yep, that's our Peter.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up