(excuse if you get this answer twice, I wasn't logged in the first time)
I don't know what he was thinking, I was just assuming and expressing my own thought about it.
I believe people wipe of tears, because they are a private thing. That doesn't mean normal people should not cry in public, but I find it rather normal to wipe of tears, unless you want everyone to know you're crying. If that's your intention you, of course it's entirely normal to let the tears roll in public. I just don't think that's what people normally want to do. Anyways, since I'm not a native English speaker, please don't to much weight on any single of my words. I did not mean to say that anyone who cries in public is an abnormal person, I rather meant that to be an abnormal thing to do, which doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad thing to do. Also that statement is just based on how I see people around me, of course.
For Bush, I believe he had a clear intention to let the tear roll in public. It was to let people know he cares so much about every single soldier that he cries for them. This of course is not a bad thing. It's just (in my opinion) obviously not his position as he has repeatedly needlessly (also my opinion) sent thousands of soldiers into death for rather business interest motives (again my opinion).
So you see, I have no clue what he is thinking (how could anyone?), but following his politics closely I have a clear opinion of at least some things he's not. And I don't believe him to be the naive guy he's playing, who didn't know there were no weapons of mass destruction (except for those the US sold to the Iraq), who did not know soldiers sent to war would eventually die, who did not know Iraq was a troubled country hard to control,... I believe he's the head of a very business driven administration, who acts in favor of the american business elite and does not care about a single soldiers life.
But maybe, that day, when he let his tear roll in public, he woke up and felt a moment of guilt, because it was him who sent those soldiers to death -- for nothing, but the worsening of the world's stability.
Very Gay. You have no idea what you are talking about. It would be wise next time when writing something that can be viewed by the public, if it is of some truth or importance whether opinion or not. Your wild and unprovoked opnions have no meaning nor will anything ever published by you have any meaning as you are only as credible as the work you publish. I believe George W. grieves more than anyone in the U.S. Descions made by the/a president are not easy nor at times very popular. It is years later that we truely understand. I served and am getting my degree as getting it while in the service would have been nearly impossible. I plan to rejoin again after I obtain my degree and if i die while in so be for w/e reason. That was my choice. No president ever sends soldiers away to die nor is he responsible for it. Know what you say before you ignorantly post nonsense!!
If you would only judge yourself the way you judge others.
I may not know all about Bush's decisions (actually I certainly don't) but some of them were wrong and the world knew in advance and they told him. He was driven by personal interest and he sent soldiers to die. He lied about a lot of facts on Iraq because without those lies congress would have never agreed to send those soldiers. Now Iraq is aflame and the safety of the US (not to mention the world) is worse than ever. Of course he is to blame for what happened because his lies are the cause.
You are a complete, ignorant fool. For one you're not an American, yet you'rte trying to justify what OUR leader thinks and does without question. He never sent our servicemen/women to die. They volunteered to protect their country by all means, as I do now. The weapons of mass destruction materials, Saddam DID have, he moved them to Syria. Why the Government covered that up and let it go, I have no idea. Long ago they had photos of convoy after convoy, headed into Syria. Maybe its a future target, I've no idea. Anyway, the ignorance that you spill is retarded. I'll gladly die for my Country any day of the week, and if that means being brainwashed, or whatnot.. then so fucking be it. I believe in carrying on my Family Tradition, and serving my Country. Semper Fidelis, USMC. Get Some.
Of course I have no insight into the decisions of Bush, but he has lied to gain support and he has done so purposely, well knowing he did. Congress supported his war because they were lied to and people thought they were sent to defend the country and so did you, yes. They did have photos of convoys, but did those convoys carry weapons of mass destruction? There never was any proof and the war failed to show that. So you think those convoy pictures weren't just another lie? Well, I disagree with you. Not without question, but at first stand and without further proof, sorry, but some satellite photos showing trucks aren't enough. Not after all that's been said that was wrong.
You said you'd gladly die for your country. Good! But would you gladly die for some oil companies? Think about it. I am not saying the war was all about oil (many people think so) but I also don't believe it was all about defending America because Iraq simply was no thread. Ok, I could be wrong again, of course, but simply because Bush says so, I won't dig it.
Btw. I agree (by now) my comment about Bush's tears was stupid.
weeks before the invasion into iraq 6 tractor trailers were spotted leavingthe country into syria. now what do you think could've been in those trucks perhaps mobil chemical labs. and have we chacked everywhere in the sand because we uncovered roughly 10 iraqi fighter jets in great condition. Also when weapons inspectors went in to investigate they found records of weapons but since their were no weapons to physically see, you assholes are fine with it. where are those weapons, there's no records of them being destroyed.
I don't know what he was thinking, I was just assuming and expressing my own thought about it.
I believe people wipe of tears, because they are a private thing. That doesn't mean normal people should not cry in public, but I find it rather normal to wipe of tears, unless you want everyone to know you're crying. If that's your intention you, of course it's entirely normal to let the tears roll in public. I just don't think that's what people normally want to do. Anyways, since I'm not a native English speaker, please don't to much weight on any single of my words. I did not mean to say that anyone who cries in public is an abnormal person, I rather meant that to be an abnormal thing to do, which doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad thing to do. Also that statement is just based on how I see people around me, of course.
For Bush, I believe he had a clear intention to let the tear roll in public. It was to let people know he cares so much about every single soldier that he cries for them. This of course is not a bad thing. It's just (in my opinion) obviously not his position as he has repeatedly needlessly (also my opinion) sent thousands of soldiers into death for rather business interest motives (again my opinion).
So you see, I have no clue what he is thinking (how could anyone?), but following his politics closely I have a clear opinion of at least some things he's not. And I don't believe him to be the naive guy he's playing, who didn't know there were no weapons of mass destruction (except for those the US sold to the Iraq), who did not know soldiers sent to war would eventually die, who did not know Iraq was a troubled country hard to control,... I believe he's the head of a very business driven administration, who acts in favor of the american business elite and does not care about a single soldiers life.
But maybe, that day, when he let his tear roll in public, he woke up and felt a moment of guilt, because it was him who sent those soldiers to death -- for nothing, but the worsening of the world's stability.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I may not know all about Bush's decisions (actually I certainly don't) but some of them were wrong and the world knew in advance and they told him. He was driven by personal interest and he sent soldiers to die. He lied about a lot of facts on Iraq because without those lies congress would have never agreed to send those soldiers. Now Iraq is aflame and the safety of the US (not to mention the world) is worse than ever. Of course he is to blame for what happened because his lies are the cause.
Reply
Reply
Of course I have no insight into the decisions of Bush, but he has lied to gain support and he has done so purposely, well knowing he did. Congress supported his war because they were lied to and people thought they were sent to defend the country and so did you, yes. They did have photos of convoys, but did those convoys carry weapons of mass destruction? There never was any proof and the war failed to show that. So you think those convoy pictures weren't just another lie? Well, I disagree with you. Not without question, but at first stand and without further proof, sorry, but some satellite photos showing trucks aren't enough. Not after all that's been said that was wrong.
You said you'd gladly die for your country. Good! But would you gladly die for some oil companies? Think about it. I am not saying the war was all about oil (many people think so) but I also don't believe it was all about defending America because Iraq simply was no thread. Ok, I could be wrong again, of course, but simply because Bush says so, I won't dig it.
Btw. I agree (by now) my comment about Bush's tears was stupid.
Reply
Reply
And you call me an idiot?
Funny.
Reply
Leave a comment