This is partly a follow-up to my
MZB vs. Fanfiction post from last week, and partly a response to a much-linked post at
http://bookshop.livejournal.com/1044495.html which answers author criticism of fanfiction by saying, “You’ve just summarily dismissed as criminal, immoral, and unimaginative each of the following Pulitzer Prize-winning works…”
(
Read more... )
I personally don't have a problem with authors who say that they worked hard on their characters and have the right to profit from them and to "own" them; I think it's a little silly to object to fic on those grounds, because I know thousands of people who have been converted to (and subsequently purchased) books, television, etc. through fandom, but if your stance is "I made these toys and I don't want you to play with them" I am enough of a preschool teacher to say, "Well, they're yours; nobody should have the right to take them if you don't want to share."
However, when it turns into "it is wrong to play with anybody's toys," I think that statement implies including the toys of people who sell the rights to their toys, people whose toys have been given either by them or by the law to the entire classroom, and people who have said, "I'm glad you like my toys! Have as much fun as you like!"
Reply
Reply
Reply
However, in the selling-it sense, I agree that legally, morally, ethically, grammatically, etc. West Side Story is very different from, say, Written by the Victors.
Reply
Leave a comment