What is Fanfiction?

Jun 04, 2010 09:30


This is partly a follow-up to my MZB vs. Fanfiction post from last week, and partly a response to a much-linked post at http://bookshop.livejournal.com/1044495.html which answers author criticism of fanfiction by saying, “You’ve just summarily dismissed as criminal, immoral, and unimaginative each of the following Pulitzer Prize-winning works…”  ( Read more... )

fanfic

Leave a comment

mtlawson June 4 2010, 13:47:11 UTC
Is 90% of the fantasy genre nothing but Tolkien fanfiction?

Or, to be more exact, Tolkien was a fanfic author of Anglo-Saxon and Norse stories. ;-)

Reply

jimhines June 4 2010, 13:49:29 UTC
Touche! Well played :-)

Reply

mtlawson June 4 2010, 13:51:06 UTC
Yep, and if we want to get into literary merit as a defining characteristic of fanfic, then most of genre fiction is in trouble. After all, significant numbers of people consider those genres lacking in literary merit.

Reply

mtlawson June 4 2010, 14:42:25 UTC
My father actually dislikes Tolkien's fiction for that reason. He considers him to be "ripping off" Norse and Celtic mythology. He was pursuing a degree in Icelandic literature when he first read them back in the seventies and was startled to realize that many of the Dwarvish names had been lifted straight from Older Edda's catalog of dwarves.

Thinking about my dad's stance, I can't help thinking that the argument about fanfiction is just a permutation on a much older and ongoing argument about the meaning of originality and creativity (with a few modern flourishes like commercialism and copyright thrown in to make things more complicated.)

Reply

thelauderdale June 4 2010, 14:42:57 UTC
Bah. That was me, by the way.

Reply

mtlawson June 4 2010, 14:52:53 UTC
Happens to all of us sometime, dude.

(The Friday must be getting to me; I've got the surfer lingo on full throttle.)

Reply

mtlawson June 4 2010, 14:59:48 UTC
Thinking about my dad's stance, I can't help thinking that the argument about fanfiction is just a permutation on a much older and ongoing argument about the meaning of originality and creativity (with a few modern flourishes like commercialism and copyright thrown in to make things more complicated.)

I've thought that too.

Really, there is very little that is new in storytelling. Every tale echoes something we've seen before, because that's how we as humans relate to each other. Something completely new would be alien to most of us, and would take years or decades to become accepted.

Reply

dweomeroflight June 5 2010, 04:54:20 UTC
I think me that you two are absolutely right.

Reply

marycatelli June 5 2010, 03:23:57 UTC
Hmm.

Especially considering that using the same name is just an allusion and is often a tribute to other authors' work. Especially since as it's not the same character and doesn't bring up copyright issues. (And trademark ones only if the name is unique and trademarked.)

Reply

b_writes June 7 2010, 01:00:15 UTC
This!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up