This is partly a follow-up to my
MZB vs. Fanfiction post from last week, and partly a response to a much-linked post at
http://bookshop.livejournal.com/1044495.html which answers author criticism of fanfiction by saying, “You’ve just summarily dismissed as criminal, immoral, and unimaginative each of the following Pulitzer Prize-winning works…”
(
Read more... )
Or, to be more exact, Tolkien was a fanfic author of Anglo-Saxon and Norse stories. ;-)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Thinking about my dad's stance, I can't help thinking that the argument about fanfiction is just a permutation on a much older and ongoing argument about the meaning of originality and creativity (with a few modern flourishes like commercialism and copyright thrown in to make things more complicated.)
Reply
Reply
(The Friday must be getting to me; I've got the surfer lingo on full throttle.)
Reply
I've thought that too.
Really, there is very little that is new in storytelling. Every tale echoes something we've seen before, because that's how we as humans relate to each other. Something completely new would be alien to most of us, and would take years or decades to become accepted.
Reply
Reply
Especially considering that using the same name is just an allusion and is often a tribute to other authors' work. Especially since as it's not the same character and doesn't bring up copyright issues. (And trademark ones only if the name is unique and trademarked.)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment