(no subject)

Oct 10, 2009 22:43

I have terribly conflicting thoughts.  I know what's real.  I think it will come out, at least in part, in something.  I think some of these ideas about being more than one person will be illustrated in my L piece.  It might never see light, but that won't really matter.  Will it?  Is the measure of success really mass appreciation (because that isn't happening).  Does failure to garner mass appreciation result in the claim that art and ideas are not for the masses?  Because, my friend, one might also suck.  Plus let's not forget lack of effort.  Is it all rationalizing?  Does the term even mean anything?  Or, is compromise necessary to make things palatable?  Certainly this is true, otherwise, like Inland Empire, it's rendered virtually meaningless.  Inscrutable to the last.

but I digress.  this was about me.  You can't shroud it in vagueries.  In a year even the originator will look at it, puzzled.  What's the line? 
Previous post Next post
Up