Can we all just calm down for a minute and remember that Guns N Roses weren't really all that great to begin with? I mean for every "Patience" and "Sweet Child O'Mine", there was a "Rocket Queen" or some such. Dude, they were only ever better than the other hair metal on MTV at the time. Seriously. They're not the fucking Beatles
(
Read more... )
Comments 21
...actually, that was shite too. nevermind.
I'm not sure if I should give Axl props for nabbing Tommy Stintson to be in GnR version 2.0...or if I should be disappointed in Tommy Stintson for agreeing to do it. Then again, if someone wanted to pay me a 6 figure salary every year for the past 7 years to play a total of about a dozen shows, I'd probably do it in a heartbeat too. Lucky bastard.
~the lad
Reply
Reply
I don't like Cream either.
Reply
I remember people dissing GnR all the time in the 90s, and I thought, rightfully so. Having more artistic substance than Winger does not a great artist make. Anyway, now the same people are calling them a classic band. What?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
When are we hanging out?
Reply
I hated them in the 80's, but about 5 years ago realized that Appetite IS a classic hard rock album. If you like that stuff.
Reply
When they were good, they were great, but they were mostly not that good.
As for Cream, I've always had a soft spot for Tales of Brave Ulysses, but will also readily admit that it's almost exactly the same as all of their other songs.
Reply
I think that's a fairly good analogy for GnR.
Reply
Leave a comment