my LJ mojo: inconclusive results

[janeandsimple]

and the verdict is:

friendly: 100%
promiscuous: 17%
random: 56%
wise: 100%
cool: 100%
hard to get: 0%

Find my LJ Mojo!

okay, what? how can i score 0% hard to get and still only 17% promiscuous?

Comments

because LJ surveys are always internally consistent, just like humans

[somerled]

very easy to get for those well-selected few you let get you

touché

[janeandsimple]

BUT HOW DOES IT KNOW THAT?

Re: because LJ surveys are always internally consistent, just like humans

[janeandsimple]

haha! now i'm curious as to what your results would be. (feel free to use a loose definition for "dated")

I make an arrow honed hard onto Random

[somerled]

Re: I make an arrow honed hard onto Random

[janeandsimple]

ha! cool. we've been figuring out the calculations. so far:

random = related to the inter-connectedness of your friends.
cool = the ratio of people who have friended you back.
hard to get = the ratio of people you haven't friended back.
friendly = the general number of people you have friended.
promiscuous = somehow related to the ratio of people you've "dated", although there seems to be some problems with this one.

no word on how one becomes wise.

they should call it the "unloved" factor

[katylyn]

Hmm, I feel like coolness can't be who's friended you back because I have a few people who never did (*sniff*) and I'm 100% cool.

Haha, I like saying that.