so tomorrow im leaving for spain with meghan for a while. i will be back after december 1st, hopefully tan and bearing gifts (cartier cigarettes are a dime a dozen over there, hope you smoke
( Read more... )
Re: Look at your life
anonymous
December 3 2003, 16:20:47 UTC
Dear Abigail Eve Fisher (is using your full name supposed to make your response sound more important or something?),
Great to hear form you, but I disagree with what you say...at least the parts that actually make sense. I do not see how my "anonymity negates my comments." My comments are based what I read on Jack's live journal and giving you my name would accomplish nothing. Besides, Jack needs more people to comment on what he does than enablers like you and his other friends.
Now let's talk about how what you wrote made no sense, but instead attempted (unsuccessfully) to sound intelligent. You say, "As you see my friend, make sure your impressions are warranted and founded before airing them to the world." First, don't call me your friend. Second, from where exactly would I see your point? You wrote one sentence before the one I am talking about and in it you in no way showed that 1. I should make sure my impressions are "warranted and founded" and 2. That my impressions were not "warranted and founded." You're right, you don't know who I am, so how do you know what I do or do not know about JAck and his lifestyle?
Next you write: "There is just one thing I don't understand; If you find livejournal to be a place where one should not share what they are going through, and what they are thinking; If you find this site to be entirely public, why would you attack Jack's lifestyle on it."
You can add me to the list of not understanding, because I don't think what you wrote even makes sense. I would suggest taking a course in logic and then attempting to rewrite whatever it was you were trying to say. Seriously, what you said makes no sense at all.
Re: Look at your lifeabragailDecember 4 2003, 17:26:41 UTC
Dear the first Anonymous,
I will talk at your level; You don't know jack. If you did, you would know what a wonderful, intelligent person he is. In only reading his live journal does not give you a full image of who he is because he isn't going to write in his livejournal about the 15 page paper he is writing on American defense mechanisms. What he writes about in his livejournal is the drama not the things he does every day. He is the editor of our school newspaper, for example, and he is always good at what he does. You said livejournal was so public, then why would you try to embarrass anyone on it. And finally, you say you only know Jack from livejournal, why not offer him the chance to know you. When you submit something like what you did, submitting it anonymously makes it harder to take anything you say seriously . For all any of us know, you are someone we know and are mad a Jack for something. That is what i mean by your anonymity negates your comments. I hope you can understand this.
Abigail Eve Fisher Oh, and I write my whole name on everything I write to strangers.
Great to hear form you, but I disagree with what you say...at least the parts that actually make sense. I do not see how my "anonymity negates my comments." My comments are based what I read on Jack's live journal and giving you my name would accomplish nothing. Besides, Jack needs more people to comment on what he does than enablers like you and his other friends.
Now let's talk about how what you wrote made no sense, but instead attempted (unsuccessfully) to sound intelligent. You say, "As you see my friend, make sure your impressions are warranted and founded before airing them to the world." First, don't call me your friend. Second, from where exactly would I see your point? You wrote one sentence before the one I am talking about and in it you in no way showed that 1. I should make sure my impressions are "warranted and founded" and 2. That my impressions were not "warranted and founded." You're right, you don't know who I am, so how do you know what I do or do not know about JAck and his lifestyle?
Next you write:
"There is just one thing I don't understand;
If you find livejournal to be a place where one should not share what they are going through, and what they are thinking; If you find this site to be entirely public, why would you attack Jack's lifestyle on it."
You can add me to the list of not understanding, because I don't think what you wrote even makes sense. I would suggest taking a course in logic and then attempting to rewrite whatever it was you were trying to say. Seriously, what you said makes no sense at all.
Have a lovely day.
Reply
I will talk at your level;
You don't know jack. If you did, you would know what a wonderful, intelligent person he is. In only reading his live journal does not give you a full image of who he is because he isn't going to write in his livejournal about the 15 page paper he is writing on American defense mechanisms. What he writes about in his livejournal is the drama not the things he does every day. He is the editor of our school newspaper, for example, and he is always good at what he does. You said livejournal was so public, then why would you try to embarrass anyone on it. And finally, you say you only know Jack from livejournal, why not offer him the chance to know you. When you submit something like what you did, submitting it anonymously makes it harder to take anything you say seriously . For all any of us know, you are someone we know and are mad a Jack for something. That is what i mean by your anonymity negates your comments. I hope you can understand this.
Abigail Eve Fisher
Oh, and I write my whole name on everything I write to strangers.
Reply
Leave a comment