Livejournal interests suggestion meme!

[ixwin]

Based on the lj interests lists of those who share my more unusual interests, the interests suggestion meme thinks I might be interested in
1. writing score: 36
2. books score: 31
3. music score: 27
4. harry potter score: 24
5. anime score: 20
6. poetry score: 20
7. cats score: 19
8. monty python score: 18
9. movies score: 17
10. chocolate score: 17
11. terry

Comments

[beccastareyes]

Okay, I need to know how browser compatable thing sucker is -- I've been trying all day to get it to work (I run Mac OS X and Safari at home and Linux Red Hat and Mozilla at work).

[ixwin]

Hmmm. It worked fine in Mozilla for me when testing and I've just tried it again now, and it worked on the second attempt. (I haven't tried it in any Mac browsers). It does seem noticeably slower to connect and run than in Internet Explorer though. I don't know why that would be - I'll point the person who maintains the server at this comment to see if he has any explanation.

In the mean-time, here are your results...
Based on the lj interests lists of those who share my more unusual interests, the interests suggestion meme thinks I might be interested in
1. lina inverse score: 33
2. reading score: 33
3. trigun score: 30
4. inuyasha score: 30
5. yaoi score: 29
6. fruits basket score: 29
7. music score: 28
8. final fantasy score: 27
9. bishounen score: 26
10. dragons score: 26
11. doujinshi score: 24
12. gravitation score: 23
13. art score: 23
14. rurouni kenshin score: 23
15. valgaav score: 23
16. allen schezar score: 21
17. gourry gabriev score: 21
18. fushigi yuugi score: 21
19. japan score: 21
20. computers score: 21

coded by ixwin
Find out more

[purplepiano]

It's just server overload, too many people trying to use it. It should behave the same whatever browser you use to call up the script - it's a server-side script so all the work is done by the web server, not the browser. The browser only displays the result page at the end, and that's simple HTML which should look the same everywhere.

[ruakh]

It should behave the same whatever browser you use to call up the script [...]

Except that some browsers, notably Safari, are less patient if your script is slow. I think Safari gives up after one minute. (? If I'm wrong about this, someone please let me know.)

[bridgetester]

True, but there's also software that removes that timeout. SafariNoTimeout or some such, rather easy to find on VersionTracker.com