(Untitled)

Dec 18, 2005 00:23

Leave a comment

Comments 34

no catsluvdmb December 18 2005, 06:32:51 UTC
nothing really jumped out at me.

Reply

Re: no myanswerismu December 18 2005, 15:08:38 UTC
irrelevant- hasty generalization

Reply

Re: no catsluvdmb December 18 2005, 16:49:28 UTC
You know, using the same lame comment isn't helping your case at all.

And that's a Care Bear Cousin, not a Care Bear.

Reply


No t3hflyingcouch December 18 2005, 06:41:03 UTC
Not seeing it. Sorry.

Reply

Re: No myanswerismu December 18 2005, 15:08:58 UTC
irrelevant- hasty generalization

Reply


No kyoshiki December 18 2005, 06:54:12 UTC
Too many people are applying. None of them are any good.

Reply

Re: No myanswerismu December 18 2005, 15:09:40 UTC
irrelevant- unsubstantiated

Reply


hyuga December 18 2005, 06:54:28 UTC
I don't read applications that don't have upper-case letters at least somewhere (not counting the cut-and-pasted questions or all caps for emphasis).

Reply

myanswerismu December 18 2005, 15:10:11 UTC
irrelevant- means not message

Reply

hyuga December 18 2005, 18:27:42 UTC
The message is irrelevant if it's inaccessable.
Or even if it's difficult to access, I have no doubt that it's not worth the effort, so I might be getting off your artsypants high horse right about now if I were you.

Reply


sadorange December 18 2005, 07:18:19 UTC
you are male? could have fooled me.

NO.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

Re: No! myanswerismu December 18 2005, 15:10:55 UTC
irrelevant- false consensus

Reply

myanswerismu December 18 2005, 15:10:31 UTC
irrelevant- improper authority

Reply


Leave a comment

Up